• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

车辆大小和运营对事故发生的影响。

Effect of bus size and operation to crash occurrences.

机构信息

Department of Civil Engineering, Tennessee State University, 3500 John A Merritt Blvd, Torrence Building, Suite 108B, Nashville, TN 37209, United States.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):2063-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.06.018. Epub 2010 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2010.06.018
PMID:20728663
Abstract

This paper evaluates roadway and operational factors considered to influence crashes involving buses. Factors evaluated included those related to bus sizes and operation services. Negative binomial (NB) and multinomial logit (MNL) models were used in linearizing and quantifying these factors with respect to crash frequency and injury severities, respectively. The results showed that position of the bus travel lane, presence or absence of on-street shoulder parking, posted speed limit, lane width, median width, number of lanes per direction and number of vehicles per lane has a higher influence on bus crashes compared to other roadway and traffic factors. Wider lanes and medians were found to reduce probability of bus crashes while more lanes and higher volume per lane were found to increase the likelihood of occurrences of bus-related crashes. Roadways with higher posted speed limits excluding freeways were found to have high probability of crashes compared to low speed limit roadways. Buses traveling on the inner lanes and making left turns were found to have higher probability of crashes compared to those traveling on the right most lanes. The same factors were found to influence injury severity though with varying magnitudes compared to crash frequency.

摘要

本文评估了被认为会影响涉及公共汽车事故的道路和运营因素。评估的因素包括与公共汽车尺寸和运营服务相关的因素。负二项式(NB)和多项逻辑回归(MNL)模型分别用于线性化和量化这些因素与事故频率和伤害严重程度的关系。结果表明,与其他道路和交通因素相比,公共汽车行驶车道的位置、是否存在路肩停车、规定的限速、车道宽度、中央隔离带宽度、每个方向的车道数和每个车道的车辆数对公共汽车事故的影响更大。较宽的车道和中央隔离带被发现降低了公共汽车事故的概率,而更多的车道和更高的每车道车流量被发现增加了公共汽车相关事故的发生可能性。与低限速道路相比,发现限速较高(不包括高速公路)的道路发生事故的概率较高。与在最右侧车道行驶并进行左转的公共汽车相比,在内侧车道行驶的公共汽车发生事故的概率更高。尽管与事故频率相比,这些因素对伤害严重程度的影响程度不同,但同样会影响伤害严重程度。

相似文献

1
Effect of bus size and operation to crash occurrences.车辆大小和运营对事故发生的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):2063-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.06.018. Epub 2010 Jul 16.
2
Influence of curbs on traffic crash frequency on high-speed roadways.高速公路路侧设施对交通事故频率的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2011 Aug;12(4):412-21. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.578285.
3
Median barrier crash severity: some new insights.中位数碰撞严重程度:一些新的见解。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1697-704. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.009. Epub 2010 May 21.
4
Predicting the frequency of median barrier crashes on Pennsylvania interstate highways.预测宾夕法尼亚州州际公路上中央分隔带碰撞事故的发生频率。
Accid Anal Prev. 2006 May;38(3):590-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.12.011. Epub 2006 Jan 26.
5
Nilsson's Power Model connecting speed and road trauma: applicability by road type and alternative models for urban roads.尼尔森动力模型关联速度与道路创伤:道路类型适用性及城市道路替代模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1908-15. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.05.012. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
6
Development of crash modification factors for changing lane width on roadway segments using generalized nonlinear models.使用广义非线性模型开发用于改变路段车道宽度的碰撞修正因子。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Mar;76:83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
7
On-road bicycle lane types, roadway characteristics, and risks for bicycle crashes.道路上的自行车道类型、道路特征与自行车碰撞事故风险。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Feb;123:123-131. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.11.017. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
8
Assessing factors causing severe injuries in crashes of high-deck buses in long-distance driving on freeways.评估高速公路长途行驶中双层巴士碰撞事故中导致重伤的因素。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Jan;62:130-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.09.016. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
9
Evaluating the safety impacts of the number and arrangement of lanes on freeway exit ramps.评估高速公路出口匝道车道数量和布局对安全的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2009 May;41(3):543-51. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.01.016. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
10
Externality of risk and crash severity at roundabouts.环岛的风险外部性和碰撞严重程度。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1966-73. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.06.001. Epub 2010 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing and predicting crash dynamics with and without road safety measures on the Dejen to Bahir Dar highway in Ethiopia.评估和预测埃塞俄比亚德金至巴赫达尔公路上有无道路安全措施时的碰撞动力学。
Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 1;15(1):32055. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09098-5.
2
Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):e1367. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1367. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Factors affecting bus accident severity in Thailand: A multinomial logit model.
影响泰国公交车事故严重程度的因素:多项逻辑回归模型。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 9;17(11):e0277318. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277318. eCollection 2022.
4
Are Bus Company Regulations Associated with Crash Risk? Findings from a Retrospective Survey in Four Chinese Cities.公交公司规定与事故风险相关吗?四城市回顾性调查的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 14;16(8):1342. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081342.