Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University Hospitals K.U. Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Oct;40(4):459-63. doi: 10.1002/uog.11163. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
To estimate the diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement in predicting intracavitary uterine pathology at offline analysis of three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound volumes of the uterus.
3D volumes (unenhanced ultrasound and gel infusion sonography with and without power Doppler, i.e. four volumes per patient) of 75 women presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding at a 'bleeding clinic' were assessed offline by six examiners. The sonologists were asked to provide a tentative diagnosis. A histological diagnosis was obtained by hysteroscopy with biopsy or operative hysteroscopy. Proliferative, secretory or atrophic endometrium was classified as 'normal' histology; endometrial polyps, intracavitary myomas, endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer were classified as 'abnormal' histology. The diagnostic accuracy of the six sonologists with regard to normal/abnormal histology and interobserver agreement were estimated.
Intracavitary pathology was diagnosed at histology in 39% of patients. Agreement between the ultrasound diagnosis and the histological diagnosis (normal vs abnormal) ranged from 67 to 83% for the six sonologists. In 45% of cases all six examiners agreed with regard to the presence/absence of intracavitary pathology. The percentage agreement between any two examiners ranged from 65 to 91% (Cohen's κ, 0.31-0.81). The Schouten κ for all six examiners was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.40-0.62), while the highest Schouten κ for any three examiners was 0.69.
When analyzing stored 3D ultrasound volumes, agreement between sonologists with regard to classifying the endometrium/uterine cavity as normal or abnormal as well as the diagnostic accuracy varied substantially. Possible actions to improve interobserver agreement and diagnostic accuracy include optimization of image quality and the use of a consistent technique for analyzing the 3D volumes.
评估离线分析三维(3D)子宫超声体积时,预测宫腔内子宫病变的诊断准确性和观察者间一致性。
在“出血诊所”就诊的 75 名异常子宫出血患者的 3D 体积(未经增强超声和凝胶输注超声,以及有无功率多普勒,即每位患者 4 个体积)由 6 名检查者离线评估。超声医生被要求提供临时诊断。通过宫腔镜活检或手术性宫腔镜检查获得组织学诊断。增生、分泌或萎缩性子宫内膜被归类为“正常”组织学;子宫内膜息肉、宫腔内肌瘤、子宫内膜增生和子宫内膜癌被归类为“异常”组织学。估计六名超声医生在正常/异常组织学方面的诊断准确性和观察者间一致性。
组织学诊断宫腔内病变的患者占 39%。六名超声医生的超声诊断与组织学诊断(正常与异常)之间的一致性为 67%至 83%。在 45%的病例中,所有六名检查者都同意存在/不存在宫腔内病变。任何两名检查者之间的百分比一致性为 65%至 91%(Cohen's κ,0.31-0.81)。六名检查者的 Schouten κ为 0.51(95%置信区间,0.40-0.62),而任何三名检查者中最高的 Schouten κ为 0.69。
在分析存储的 3D 超声体积时,超声医生在将子宫内膜/子宫腔分类为正常或异常方面的一致性以及诊断准确性差异很大。提高观察者间一致性和诊断准确性的可能措施包括优化图像质量和使用一致的技术分析 3D 体积。