Suppr超能文献

苯肾上腺素推注法与输注法在压力反射测量中的比较。

Comparison of phenylephrine bolus and infusion methods in baroreflex measurements.

作者信息

Sullebarger J T, Liang C S, Woolf P D, Willick A E, Richeson J F

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York 14642.

出版信息

J Appl Physiol (1985). 1990 Sep;69(3):962-7. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1990.69.3.962.

Abstract

Phenylephrine (PE) bolus and infusion methods have both been used to measure baroreflex sensitivity in humans. To determine whether the two methods produce the same values of baroreceptor sensitivity, we administered intravenous PE by both bolus injection and graded infusion methods to 17 normal subjects. Baroreflex sensitivity was determined from the slope of the linear relationship between the cardiac cycle length (R-R interval) and systolic arterial pressure. Both methods produced similar peak increases in arterial pressure and reproducible results of baroreflex sensitivity in the same subjects, but baroreflex slopes measured by the infusion method (9.9 +/- 0.7 ms/mmHg) were significantly lower than those measured by the bolus method (22.5 +/- 1.8 ms/mmHg, P less than 0.0001). Pretreatment with atropine abolished the heart rate response to PE given by both methods, whereas plasma catecholamines were affected by neither method of PE administration. Naloxone pretreatment exaggerated the pressor response to PE and increased plasma beta-endorphin response to PE infusion but had no effect on baroreflex sensitivity. Thus our results indicate that 1) activation of the baroreflex by the PE bolus and infusion methods, although reproducible, is not equivalent, 2) baroreflex-induced heart rate response to a gradual increase in pressure is less than that seen with a rapid rise, 3) in both methods, heart rate response is mediated by the vagus nerves, and 4) neither the sympathetic nervous system nor the endogenous opiate system has a significant role in mediating the baroreflex control of heart rate to a hypertensive stimulus in normal subjects.

摘要

去氧肾上腺素(PE)推注法和输注法均已用于测量人体压力反射敏感性。为了确定这两种方法是否产生相同的压力感受器敏感性值,我们通过推注注射和分级输注法对17名正常受试者静脉给予PE。压力反射敏感性由心动周期长度(R-R间期)与动脉收缩压之间的线性关系斜率确定。两种方法在同一受试者中均产生了相似的动脉压峰值升高和可重复的压力反射敏感性结果,但输注法测得的压力反射斜率(9.9±0.7毫秒/毫米汞柱)显著低于推注法(22.5±1.8毫秒/毫米汞柱,P<0.0001)。阿托品预处理消除了两种方法给予PE时的心率反应,而血浆儿茶酚胺不受两种PE给药方法的影响。纳洛酮预处理增强了对PE的升压反应,并增加了血浆β-内啡肽对PE输注反应,但对压力反射敏感性无影响。因此,我们的结果表明:1)PE推注法和输注法激活压力反射,虽然可重复,但并不等效;2)压力反射引起的心率对压力逐渐升高的反应小于快速升高时的反应;3)在两种方法中,心率反应均由迷走神经介导;4)在正常受试者中,交感神经系统和内源性阿片系统在介导压力反射对高血压刺激的心率控制中均不起重要作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验