Suppr超能文献

内源性血管紧张素II与压力感受器功能障碍:氯沙坦与依那普利对人体影响的比较研究

Endogenous angiotensin II and baroreceptor dysfunction: a comparative study of losartan and enalapril in man.

作者信息

Yee K M, Struthers A D

机构信息

University Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Dec;46(6):583-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00832.x.

Abstract

AIMS

To assess the role of direct ATI receptor antagonism in baroreceptor modulation in man, and to perform a direct comparison of Ang II blockade at the receptor level with that of ACE inhibition.

METHODS

Ten healthy male volunteers [mean age (s.d.) 23 (6.9)] pretreated with frusemide therapy (40 mg day(-1) for 3 days prior to each visit) were studied on 3 separate days, 10 days apart, in a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, cross-over fashion. On each study day, subjects were randomly given either a single-dose of enalapril 20 mg, losartan 50 mg or placebo. Baroreceptor function was assessed by measuring changes in blood pressure (BP), pulse interval (RR Int) and heart rate (HR) in response to incremental doses of intravenous phenylephrine infusions (0.2-3.6 microg kg(-1) min(-1)).

RESULTS

In response to phenylephrine, no significant differences in BP responses were observed with any of the study medications but reflex heart rate responses were significantly increased with both enalapril and losartan compared with placebo (P<0.05). The (RR/AsBP ratio, taken as a measure of baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS) was significantly increased with enalapril 112.2+4.6 ms mmHg (mean+s.d.)] and losartan [11.9+3.6msmmHg(-1)] compared with placebo [9.2+4.5 ms mmHg(-1)]; i.e. enalapril and losartan increased the (RR/(delta sBP ratio by 3.0 ms mmHg(-1) (95%CI 0.5, 5.6; P<0.05) and 2.8 ms mmHg(-1) (95%CI 0.6, 5.0; P< 0.038), respectively. There were however, no significant differences between losartan and enalapril [mean difference 0.25 (95%CI - 1.6, 2.1)].

CONCLUSIONS

The present study confirms observations from animal models that blocking endogenous angiotensin II in man improves baroreceptor function. Both strategies, ATI receptor antagonism and ACE inhibition appear to be equally effective in restoring baroreceptor function in salt-depleted normotensive subjects.

摘要

目的

评估直接ATI受体拮抗在人体压力感受器调节中的作用,并在受体水平上对血管紧张素II阻断与血管紧张素转换酶抑制进行直接比较。

方法

10名健康男性志愿者[平均年龄(标准差)23(6.9)岁],在每次就诊前3天接受速尿治疗(40mg/天),在3个不同的日子进行研究,间隔10天,采用安慰剂对照、随机、双盲、交叉方式。在每个研究日,受试者随机给予单剂量的依那普利20mg、氯沙坦50mg或安慰剂。通过测量静脉注射去氧肾上腺素递增剂量(0.2 - 3.6μg/kg-1/min-1)时血压(BP)、脉搏间期(RR Int)和心率(HR)的变化来评估压力感受器功能。

结果

对去氧肾上腺素的反应,任何研究药物的血压反应均无显著差异,但与安慰剂相比,依那普利和氯沙坦的反射性心率反应均显著增加(P<0.05)。作为压力感受器敏感性(BRS)指标的(RR/AsBP比值,依那普利[112.2 + 4.6ms mmHg(均值±标准差)]和氯沙坦[11.9 + 3.6ms mmHg-1]与安慰剂[9.2 + 4.5ms mmHg-1]相比显著增加;即依那普利和氯沙坦使(RR/(delta sBP比值分别增加3.0ms mmHg-1(95%CI 0.5, 5.6;P<0.05)和2.8ms mmHg-1(95%CI 0.6, 5.0;P<0.038)。然而,氯沙坦和依那普利之间无显著差异[平均差异0.25(95%CI - 1.6, 2.1)]。

结论

本研究证实了动物模型的观察结果,即阻断人体内源性血管紧张素II可改善压力感受器功能。在盐缺乏的正常血压受试者中,ATI受体拮抗和ACE抑制这两种策略在恢复压力感受器功能方面似乎同样有效。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Hypercholesterolemia is associated with enhanced angiotensin AT1-receptor expression.
Am J Physiol. 1997 Jun;272(6 Pt 2):H2701-7. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1997.272.6.H2701.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验