Mental Health and Mental Retardation Authority of Harris County, Comprehensive Psychiatry Emergency Program, Houston, Texas.
West J Emerg Med. 2012 Feb;13(1):35-40. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2011.9.6867.
Issues surrounding reduction and/or elimination of episodes of seclusion and restraint for patients with behavioral problems in crisis clinics, emergency departments, inpatient psychiatric units, and specialized psychiatric emergency services continue to be an area of concern and debate among mental health clinicians. An important underlying principle of Project BETA (Best practices in Evaluation and Treatment of Agitation) is noncoercive de-escalation as the intervention of choice in the management of acute agitation and threatening behavior. In this article, the authors discuss several aspects of seclusion and restraint, including review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services guidelines regulating their use in medical behavioral settings, negative consequences of this intervention to patients and staff, and a review of quality improvement and risk management strategies that have been effective in decreasing their use in various treatment settings. An algorithm designed to help the clinician determine when seclusion or restraint is most appropriate is introduced. The authors conclude that the specialized psychiatric emergency services and emergency departments, because of their treatment primarily of acute patients, may not be able to entirely eliminate the use of seclusion and restraint events, but these programs can adopt strategies to reduce the utilization rate of these interventions.
在危机诊所、急诊部、住院精神病病房和专门的精神科急诊服务中,减少和/或消除有行为问题的患者被隔离和约束的情况,一直是精神科临床医生关注和争论的一个问题。项目 BETA(急性激越和威胁行为评估与治疗的最佳实践)的一个重要基本原则是非强制性的降级治疗,作为管理急性激越和威胁行为的首选干预措施。在本文中,作者讨论了隔离和约束的几个方面,包括审查医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心规范其在医疗行为环境中的使用的指南、该干预措施对患者和工作人员的负面影响,以及审查在各种治疗环境中减少其使用的有效质量改进和风险管理策略。引入了一个旨在帮助临床医生确定何时最适合隔离或约束的算法。作者得出结论,由于专门的精神科急诊服务和急诊部主要治疗急性患者,可能无法完全消除隔离和约束事件的使用,但这些计划可以采取策略来降低这些干预措施的利用率。