Suppr超能文献

494 名婴儿经 972 次玻璃化胚胎移植分娩的围产儿和新生儿结局。

Perinatal and neonatal outcomes of 494 babies delivered from 972 vitrified embryo transfers.

机构信息

Assisted Reproduction Center, Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Shaanxi Province, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2012 Jun;97(6):1338-42. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.02.051. Epub 2012 Mar 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety of vitrification of embryos by comparing the perinatal outcome of vitrified day 3 ETs with fresh cleavage-stage ETs.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

Assisted reproduction center.

PATIENT(S): A total of 806 women with 494 infants delivered were included.

INTERVENTION(S): Supernumerary embryos and embryos of patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were vitrified using a Cryotop carrier in an open system and were transferred after warming.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Implantation and pregnancy rates, obstetric outcomes, neonatal outcomes, and congenital birth defects.

RESULT(S): A total of 2,543 vitrified embryos were warmed, and 2,375 survived and were transferred. The implantation, pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates were 26.91%, 47.22%, 6.07%, and 38.58%, respectively. In singletons, the mean birth weight was 3,337.44 g, and the mean Apgar scores were 8.91, 9.85, and 9.89 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes, respectively. In multiple gestations, the mean birth weight was 2,556.45 g, and the mean Apgar scores were 8.90, 9.34, and 9.47 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes, respectively. Only seven congenital malformations were observed among the 494 babies. Compared with fresh cleavage-stage ETs, the mean birth weight in the vitrified group was higher in both singleton and multiple gestations. All the other results were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION(S): Compared with fresh ETs, vitrified day 3 ET shows no significant differences in obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. The study suggests that vitrification with Cryotop is an effective and safe method for the cryopreservation of human cleavage-stage (day 3) embryos.

摘要

目的

通过比较玻璃化冷冻的第 3 天胚胎与新鲜卵裂期胚胎的围产结局,评估胚胎玻璃化冷冻的安全性。

设计

回顾性分析。

地点

辅助生殖中心。

患者

共纳入 806 名患者,其中 494 名分娩。

干预

使用 Cryotop 载体在开放系统中对多余胚胎和有卵巢过度刺激综合征风险的患者胚胎进行玻璃化冷冻,并在解冻后进行移植。

主要观察指标

胚胎种植率、妊娠率、产科结局、新生儿结局和先天性出生缺陷。

结果

共解冻 2543 枚玻璃化冷冻胚胎,其中 2375 枚存活并移植。胚胎种植率、妊娠率、流产率和活产率分别为 26.91%、47.22%、6.07%和 38.58%。在单胎妊娠中,平均出生体重为 3337.44 g,1、5 和 10 分钟时的平均 Apgar 评分为 8.91、9.85 和 9.89。在多胎妊娠中,平均出生体重为 2556.45 g,1、5 和 10 分钟时的平均 Apgar 评分为 8.90、9.34 和 9.47。在 494 名婴儿中仅观察到 7 例先天性畸形。与新鲜卵裂期胚胎相比,玻璃化组单胎和多胎妊娠的平均出生体重均较高。两组的其他结果相似。

结论

与新鲜胚胎相比,玻璃化冷冻的第 3 天胚胎在产科和新生儿结局方面没有显著差异。研究表明,Cryotop 玻璃化冷冻是一种有效且安全的人类卵裂期(第 3 天)胚胎冷冻方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验