Treatment outcome in the most severely affected Legg-Perthes patients, comparing prolonged traction in abduction with femoral varus derotation treatment.

PURPOSE

Compare conservative and operative treatment in the most severely affected Legg-Perthes disease patients.

METHODS

29 patients (14 conservative and 15 operative) with 32 affected hips (16 conservative and 16 operative) were evaluated, all Catterall 3 or 4. The conservative group, with a median age-at-onset of 4.8 (range, 2.5-9.5) years, was treated by a rigorous regime of traction in abduction for an average of two years. Follow-up was performed at a median of 28.6 (range, 17.4-31.6) years with a median patient age of 34.1 (range, 19.9-39.3) years. The operative group, with a median age-at-onset of 4.7 (range, 2.0-7.8) years, was treated by femoral varus derotation osteotomy. Follow-up was performed at a median of 14 (range, 8-21.4) years, with a median patient age of 20.7 (range, 12.8-28) years.

RESULTS

Median age-at-onset (P = 0.16) and Catterall classification (P = 0.29) were comparable. No differences could be found for the Stulberg classification (P = 0.83), functional parameters (Harris Hip score and Merle d'Aubigné and Postel), and leg-length differences. Career choices were similar for both patient groups, as well.

CONCLUSIONS

Given methodological issues, femoral varus derotation osteotomy did not show apparent better results than the conservative containment regime in Catterall 3 and 4 patients with a median age-at-onset around 4.8 years. This result is fairly similar to recent literature suggesting a conservative approach in most severely affected patients with a young age-at-onset. However, based on unacceptable socioeconomic issues, the conservative regime evaluated in the present study cannot be justified, nowadays.