Suppr超能文献

改善从养老院入院患者的医院结局:一项对照试验的结果。

Improving hospital outcomes in patients admitted from residential aged care: results from a controlled trial.

机构信息

Internal Medicine and Aged Care, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, 3rd Floor, James Mayne Building, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, Queensland 4029, Australia.

出版信息

Age Ageing. 2012 Sep;41(5):670-3. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afs045. Epub 2012 Apr 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

residents of aged care are old, frail and frequently require hospital management of intercurrent illness, but hospital outcomes are poor.

OBJECTIVE

to identify the impact of an interdisciplinary care model on medical inpatients admitted from residential aged care (RAC).

DESIGN

pre-planned subgroup analysis of controlled trial.

SETTING

general medical units of a teaching hospital in Brisbane, Australia.

SUBJECTS

consecutive patients aged over 65 admitted from RAC (n = 189) or the community (n = 815).

METHODS

all admitted general medical patients were allocated by existing cyclical roster to control (usual care) or intervention units (interdisciplinary care consisting of improved allied health staffing, consistent teams, daily team meetings and early discharge planning). Patient characteristics and outcomes of care were compared between RAC and community subgroups. In the RAC subgroup, outcomes were compared between the control and intervention groups.

RESULTS

patients admitted from RAC had much higher in-hospital mortality (13 versus 6%) and 6-month mortality (35 versus 17%) than those from community. RAC residents receiving the intervention had a significant reduction in in-hospital mortality (4 versus 22% P < 0.001) sustained at 6 months (28 versus 44% P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

poor hospital outcomes for RAC residents may reflect prevailing models of inpatient care.

摘要

背景

老年护理院的居民年老体弱,经常需要医院治疗急性病,但医院的治疗效果不佳。

目的

确定跨学科护理模式对从养老院(RAC)转入的住院内科患者的影响。

设计

对照试验的预先计划亚组分析。

地点

澳大利亚布里斯班一所教学医院的普通内科病房。

受试者

连续入住 RAC(n=189)或社区(n=815)的 65 岁以上患者。

方法

所有入住的普通内科患者均按现行周期性名单分配至对照组(常规护理)或干预组(跨学科护理,包括改善的辅助医疗人员配置、固定团队、每日团队会议和提前出院计划)。在 RAC 和社区亚组之间比较患者特征和护理结果。在 RAC 亚组中,比较对照组和干预组的结果。

结果

从 RAC 转入的患者住院死亡率(13%比 6%)和 6 个月死亡率(35%比 17%)明显高于从社区转入的患者。接受干预的 RAC 居民的住院死亡率显著降低(4%比 22%,P<0.001),6 个月时仍保持(28%比 44%,P=0.02)。

结论

RAC 居民住院治疗效果不佳可能反映了现有的住院治疗模式。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验