• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放活体供肾肾切除术、腹腔镜活体供肾肾切除术及手辅助活体供肾肾切除术的比较:成本最小化分析

Comparison of open live donor nephrectomy, laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy, and hand-assisted live donor nephrectomy: a cost-minimization analysis.

作者信息

Dageforde Leigh Anne, Moore Deonna R, Landman Matthew P, Feurer Irene D, Pinson C Wright, Poulose Benjamin, Penson David F, Moore Derek E

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2012 Aug;176(2):e89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.12.013. Epub 2012 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2011.12.013
PMID:22472697
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Live donor kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease. Open donor nephrectomy (ODN) was the standard until the introduction of the laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) in 1995. Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HALDN) was added shortly thereafter. The laparoscopic techniques are associated with increased operating room times and equipment costs; however, these techniques speed patient return to normal activity. The aim of this study is to evaluate the cost of these techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A decision analysis model was developed to simulate outcomes for donors undergoing ODN, LDN, and HALDN. Outcomes were simulated from both the institutional perspective (IP) and the societal perspective (SP). Baseline values and ranges were determined from a systematic review of the literature. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test model strength.

RESULTS

From the IP, ODN is the least costly strategy with a cost of $11,000, while the cost is $15,200 for HALDN and $15,800 for LDN. From the SP, HALDN is the least costly strategy costing $27,800, while the cost for LDN is $29,000 and for ODN is $41,000. In sensitivity analysis, ODN only became the dominant strategy if the days till return to work exceeded 58 in the HALDN strategy. LDN and HALDN were nearly equivalent as the rate of open conversion of LDN approached zero.

CONCLUSIONS

HALDN is the least costly donor nephrectomy strategy, especially from the SP. The primary determinants of cost in this model are conversion to open and days till return to work.

摘要

背景

活体供肾移植是终末期肾病的首选治疗方法。在1995年腹腔镜供肾切除术(LDN)出现之前,开放供肾切除术(ODN)一直是标准术式。此后不久又增加了手辅助腹腔镜供肾切除术(HALDN)。腹腔镜技术虽然会增加手术室时间和设备成本,但这些技术能加快患者恢复正常活动。本研究的目的是评估这些技术的成本。

材料与方法

建立了一个决策分析模型,以模拟接受ODN、LDN和HALDN的供者的结局。从机构视角(IP)和社会视角(SP)模拟结局。通过对文献的系统回顾确定基线值和范围。进行敏感性分析以检验模型的稳健性。

结果

从IP来看,ODN是成本最低的策略,成本为11,000美元,而HALDN的成本为15,200美元,LDN的成本为15,800美元。从SP来看,HALDN是成本最低的策略,成本为27,800美元,而LDN的成本为29,000美元,ODN的成本为41,000美元。在敏感性分析中,只有当HALDN策略中恢复工作的天数超过58天时,ODN才成为主导策略。随着LDN的开放转换率接近零,LDN和HALDN几乎相当。

结论

HALDN是成本最低的供肾切除术策略,尤其是从SP角度来看。该模型中成本的主要决定因素是转换为开放手术以及恢复工作的天数。

相似文献

1
Comparison of open live donor nephrectomy, laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy, and hand-assisted live donor nephrectomy: a cost-minimization analysis.开放活体供肾肾切除术、腹腔镜活体供肾肾切除术及手辅助活体供肾肾切除术的比较:成本最小化分析
J Surg Res. 2012 Aug;176(2):e89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.12.013. Epub 2012 Mar 10.
2
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors.机器人辅助与腹腔镜辅助与开放性肾切除术用于活体供肾者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 9;5(5):CD006124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006124.pub3.
3
How safe is hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy?--results of 200 live donor nephrectomies by two different techniques.手辅助腹腔镜供肾切除术有多安全?——两种不同技术进行的200例活体供肾切除术的结果
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009 Jan;24(1):293-7. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn463. Epub 2008 Aug 18.
4
Why potential live renal donors prefer laparoscopic nephrectomy: a survey of live donor attitudes.潜在活体肾供体为何更倾向于腹腔镜肾切除术:对活体供体态度的一项调查
BJU Int. 2007 Dec;100(6):1344-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07126.x. Epub 2007 Sep 11.
5
University of Kentucky experience with laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy using two different techniques.肯塔基大学采用两种不同技术进行腹腔镜活体供肾切除术的经验。
Int Surg. 2006 Nov-Dec;91(6):332-5.
6
Cost effectiveness of laparoscopic versus mini-incision open donor nephrectomy: a randomized study.腹腔镜与小切口开放性供体肾切除术的成本效益:一项随机研究。
Transplantation. 2007 Jun 27;83(12):1582-7. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000267149.64831.08.
7
Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: a single-center sequential experience comparing hand-assisted versus standard technique.腹腔镜活体供肾切除术:单中心比较手辅助与标准技术的序贯经验。
Urology. 2007 Dec;70(6):1060-3. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.018.
8
Cost-effectiveness of hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic versus standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a randomized study.手助式后腹腔镜与标准腹腔镜供肾切取术的成本效果比较:一项随机研究。
Transplantation. 2013 Jul 27;96(2):170-5. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318296ca25.
9
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: impact on an established renal transplant program.腹腔镜供体肾切除术:对一个成熟肾移植项目的影响。
Am Surg. 2000 Dec;66(12):1132-5.
10
Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜与开放性供肾切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验。
BJU Int. 2005 Apr;95(6):851-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05415.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical complications of open nephrectomy in living related donors in Yemen: a prospective study.也门活体亲属供体开放性肾切除术的手术并发症:一项前瞻性研究。
Turk J Urol. 2017 Dec;43(4):549-552. doi: 10.5152/tud.2017.25738. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
2
Comparison of the laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy: an overview of surgical complications and outcome.腹腔镜与开放活体供肾切除术的比较:手术并发症及结果概述
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Jun;399(5):543-51. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1196-4. Epub 2014 Apr 28.