Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Braz Oral Res. 2012 Mar-Apr;26(2):93-9. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242012000200002.
Because discomfort caused by different approximal caries detection methods can influence their performance, the assessment of this discomfort is important. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the discomfort reported by children after the use of different diagnostic methods to detect approximal caries lesions in primary teeth: visual inspection, bitewing radiography, laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent pen - LFpen) and temporary separation with orthodontic rubbers. Seventy-six children aged 4 to 12 years were examined using these methods. Their discomfort was assessed using the Wong-Baker scale and compared among the methods. Visual inspection caused less discomfort than did other methods. Radiography and the LFpen presented similar levels of discomfort. Older children reported higher discomfort using temporary separation, whereas younger children reported less discomfort with the LFpen. In conclusion, radiographic, temporary separation and LFpen methods provoke higher discomfort than visual inspection.
由于不同的邻面龋检测方法引起的不适会影响其性能,因此评估这种不适很重要。因此,本研究旨在评估儿童在使用不同诊断方法检测乳牙邻面龋损后报告的不适:肉眼检查、牙合翼片、激光荧光(DIAGNOdent 笔-LFpen)和正畸橡皮圈临时分离。76 名 4 至 12 岁的儿童使用这些方法进行检查。使用 Wong-Baker 量表评估他们的不适,并比较这些方法之间的差异。肉眼检查引起的不适小于其他方法。牙合翼片和 LFpen 引起的不适程度相似。使用临时分离时,年龄较大的儿童报告的不适程度更高,而年龄较小的儿童使用 LFpen 报告的不适程度较低。总之,影像学、临时分离和 LFpen 方法引起的不适比肉眼检查更严重。