Pontes Laura Regina Antunes, Novaes Tatiane Fernandes, Moro Bruna Lorena Pereira, Braga Mariana Minatel, Mendes Fausto Medeiros
Universidade de São Paulo - USP, School of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul, School of Dentistry, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Braz Oral Res. 2017 Nov 6;31:e91. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0091.
We aimed to investigate the performance of fluorescence-based methods (FBMs), compared to visual inspection after histological validation, in detecting and assessing the activity status of occlusal carious lesions in primary teeth. One examiner evaluated 50 primary molars close to exfoliation in 24 children. Teeth were assessed using quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) and pen-type laser fluorescence (LFpen). After exfoliation, histological validation was performed. Teeth were cut and sections were evaluated for lesion depth and activity status (after utilization of a pH indicator) under a stereomicroscope. Parameters related to the performance of the methods in detecting caries lesions at two thresholds (initial and dentin lesions) were calculated. Regarding the activity status, lesions were classified into sound+inactive or active, and the area under the ROC curve and the diagnostic odds ratio values of the methods were calculated and compared. Evaluation of red fluorescence using QLF presented higher sensitivity but lower specificity than visual inspection in detecting dentin caries lesions. However, QLF considering different parameters and LFpen had similar performance to that obtained with visual inspection. Regarding activity assessment, all FBMs and visual inspection also presented similar performance. In conclusion, FBMs did not prove advantageous for the detection and activity assessment of occlusal caries lesions in primary molars when compared to visual inspection.
我们旨在研究基于荧光的方法(FBMs)与组织学验证后的目视检查相比,在检测和评估乳牙咬合面龋损活动状态方面的性能。一名检查者对24名儿童中接近脱落的50颗乳磨牙进行了评估。使用定量光诱导荧光(QLF)和笔式激光荧光(LFpen)对牙齿进行评估。牙齿脱落后,进行组织学验证。将牙齿切开,并在体视显微镜下使用pH指示剂评估切片的病变深度和活动状态。计算了在两个阈值(初始龋损和牙本质龋损)下这些方法检测龋损的相关参数。关于活动状态,将病变分为健康+静止或活动,并计算和比较了这些方法的ROC曲线下面积和诊断比值比。在检测牙本质龋损时,使用QLF评估红色荧光的敏感性高于目视检查,但特异性较低。然而,考虑不同参数的QLF和LFpen的性能与目视检查相似。关于活动评估,所有FBMs和目视检查的性能也相似。总之,与目视检查相比,FBMs在检测和评估乳磨牙咬合面龋损方面并无优势。