Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea.
Hepatology. 2012 Sep;56(3):1053-62. doi: 10.1002/hep.25752. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
The measurement of the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) for the estimation of portal hypertension (PH) in cirrhosis has some limitations, including its invasiveness. Hepatic vein arrival time (HVAT), as assessed by microbubble contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS), is negatively correlated with the histological grade of liver fibrosis because of the associated hemodynamic abnormalities. Anatomical and pathophysiological changes in liver microcirculation are the initial events leading to PH. However, the direct relationship between HVAT and PH has not been evaluated. The present study measured both HVPG and HVAT in 71 consecutive patients with compensated cirrhosis and analyzed the relationship between the two parameters (i.e., the derivation set). Results were validated in 35 compensated patients with cirrhosis at another medical center (i.e., the validation set). The derivation set had HVPG and HVAT values of 11.4 ± 5.0 mmHg (mean ± standard deviation; range, 2-23) and 14.1 ± 3.4 seconds (range, 8.4-24.2), respectively; there was a statistically significant negative correlation between HVPG and HVAT (r(2) = 0.545; P < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.973 for clinically significant PH (CSPH; HVPG, ≥ 10 mmHg), and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and positive and negative likelihood ratios for CSPH for an HVAT cut-off value of 14 seconds were 92.7%, 86.7%, 90.5%, 89.7%, 6.95, and 0.08, respectively. In addition, a shorter HVAT was associated with worse Child-Pugh score (P < 0.001) and esophageal varices (P = 0.018). In the validation set, there was also a significant negative correlation between HVAT and HVPG (r(2) = 0.538; P < 0.001), and AUROC = 0.953 for CSPH. HVAT was significantly correlated with PH. These results indicate that measuring HVAT is useful for the noninvasive prediction of CSPH in patients with compensated cirrhosis.
肝静脉压力梯度(HVPG)测量用于估计肝硬化门静脉高压(PH)有一些局限性,包括其侵袭性。通过微泡对比增强超声(CEUS)评估的肝静脉到达时间(HVAT)与组织学肝纤维化程度呈负相关,因为存在相关的血流动力学异常。肝微循环的解剖和病理生理变化是导致 PH 的初始事件。然而,HVAT 与 PH 之间的直接关系尚未得到评估。本研究测量了 71 例代偿性肝硬化患者的 HVPG 和 HVAT,并分析了这两个参数之间的关系(即推导集)。在另一家医疗中心的 35 例代偿性肝硬化患者中验证了结果(即验证集)。推导集的 HVPG 和 HVAT 值分别为 11.4±5.0mmHg(均值±标准差;范围,2-23)和 14.1±3.4 秒(范围,8.4-24.2);HVPG 和 HVAT 之间存在显著的负相关(r²=0.545;P<0.001)。对于临床上显著的 PH(CSPH;HVPG,≥10mmHg),接受者操作特征曲线(AUROC)的面积为 0.973,HVAT 截断值为 14 秒时,CSPH 的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、阳性和阴性似然比分别为 92.7%、86.7%、90.5%、89.7%、6.95 和 0.08。此外,较短的 HVAT 与更差的 Child-Pugh 评分(P<0.001)和食管静脉曲张(P=0.018)相关。在验证集中,HVAT 与 HVPG 之间也存在显著的负相关(r²=0.538;P<0.001),CSPH 的 AUROC=0.953。HVAT 与 PH 显著相关。这些结果表明,测量 HVAT 可用于非侵入性预测代偿性肝硬化患者的 CSPH。