Luna Dolores, Montoro Pedro R
Departamento de Psicología Básica 1, Facultad de Psicología, UNED, C/Juan del Rosal 10, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Perception. 2011;40(12):1467-77. doi: 10.1068/p7086.
The interactions between intrinsic grouping principles (by proximity or by similarity in shape or luminance) and extrinsic grouping by common region were examined by presenting both principles acting alone or conjoined with another principle in visual patterns. The procedure used in our study closely mirrored that of Quinlan and Wilton (1998 Perception 27 417-430). However, in the present experiment, the intrinsic and extrinsic grouping principles involved had similar relative salience in order to avoid their possible effects on interactions. The results showed that the grouping effect of conjoined cooperating principles was greater than that of either principle acting alone, and the grouping effect of conjoined competing principles was lower than that of either principle operating alone. Compatibility of data with additive effects of grouping principles has been examined.
通过在视觉图案中呈现单独起作用或与另一原则结合起作用的两种原则,研究了内在分组原则(按接近度或形状或亮度的相似性)与通过共同区域进行的外在分组之间的相互作用。我们研究中使用的程序与昆兰和威尔顿(1998年,《感知》27卷,417 - 430页)的程序极为相似。然而,在本实验中,所涉及的内在和外在分组原则具有相似的相对显著性,以避免它们对相互作用可能产生的影响。结果表明,联合协作原则的分组效应大于单独起作用的任何一个原则,联合竞争原则的分组效应低于单独起作用的任何一个原则。已经检验了数据与分组原则的累加效应的兼容性。