Quinlan P T, Wilton R N
Department of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, UK.
Perception. 1998;27(4):417-30. doi: 10.1068/p270417.
The nature of the psychological processes that underlie the Gestalt principles of grouping by proximity and grouping by similarity is examined. Similarity was defined relative to the principles of grouping by common colour and grouping by common shape. Subjects were presented with displays comprising a row of seven coloured shapes and were asked to rate the degree to which the central target shape grouped with either the right or the left flanking shapes. Across the displays the proximal and featural relationships between the target and flankers were varied. These ratings reflected persuasive effects of grouping by proximity and common colour; there was only weak evidence for grouping by common shape. Nevertheless, both common colour and common shape were shown to override grouping by proximity, under certain conditions. The data also show that to understand how the Gestalt principles operate it appears necessary to consider processes that operate within and between groups of elements that are initially identified on the basis of proximity. Whether such groups survive further analysis depends critically on the featural content of the constituent elements.
我们研究了构成格式塔相近性分组原则和相似性分组原则基础的心理过程的本质。相似性是相对于共同颜色分组原则和共同形状分组原则来定义的。向受试者展示由一排七个彩色形状组成的展示物,并要求他们对中央目标形状与右侧或左侧侧翼形状分组的程度进行评分。在所有展示物中,目标形状与侧翼形状之间的相近性和特征关系各不相同。这些评分反映了相近性分组和共同颜色分组的显著效果;而共同形状分组的证据则很薄弱。然而,在某些条件下,共同颜色和共同形状都被证明会优先于相近性分组。数据还表明,要理解格式塔原则是如何运作的,似乎有必要考虑在最初基于相近性识别出的元素组内和组间起作用的过程。这些组是否能经受进一步分析,关键取决于构成元素的特征内容。