Suppr超能文献

触觉中分组原则的相互作用动态:现象学和心理物理学证据。

Interaction dynamics between grouping principles in touch: phenomenological and psychophysical evidence.

机构信息

Departamento de Psicología Básica II, Studies on Aging and Neurodegenerative Diseases Research Group, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, C/Juan del Rosal, 10, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2019 Nov;83(8):1612-1625. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1029-0. Epub 2018 May 24.

Abstract

In two experiments, we investigated the interactions between the grouping principles of spatial proximity and texture similarity in touch. For that purpose, we adapted to touch two paradigms widely employed in vision. In Experiment 1, we used an experimental phenomenological task consisting of rating the strength of grouping in both acting alone and conjoined cooperative and competitive conditions. In Experiment 2, participants performed a psychophysical task in which an objective (in)correct response was defined by selectively attending to one grouping cue in different blocks of trials. The results showed that spatial proximity dominated over texture similarity when the two principles were conjoined in competition. In addition, the present results are compatible with an additive model of grouping effects as indicated by the greater grouping effect in the cooperative condition and the smaller grouping effect in the competitive condition relative to a.0cting alone grouping principles. The similarities and differences between vision and touch are discussed.

摘要

在两项实验中,我们研究了触觉中空间接近性和纹理相似性分组原则之间的相互作用。为此,我们采用了两种在视觉中广泛应用的范式来适应触觉。在实验 1 中,我们使用了一种实验现象学任务,包括对单独作用、联合协作和竞争条件下分组强度进行评分。在实验 2 中,参与者执行了一项心理物理任务,其中通过在不同的试验块中选择性地关注一个分组线索来定义客观的(正确或错误)响应。结果表明,当两个原则在竞争中结合时,空间接近性优先于纹理相似性。此外,与单独作用的分组原则相比,合作条件下的分组效果更大,竞争条件下的分组效果更小,这表明分组效应的加性模型是兼容的。讨论了视觉和触觉之间的相似点和差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验