• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对决策相关信息的注意力方面的年龄差异:教育很重要。

Age differences in attention toward decision-relevant information: education matters.

作者信息

Xing Cai, Isaacowitz Derek

机构信息

Renmin University of China.

出版信息

Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2011;73(4):299-312. doi: 10.2190/AG.73.4.b.

DOI:10.2190/AG.73.4.b
PMID:22474913
Abstract

Previous studies suggested that older adults are more likely to engage in heuristic decision-making than young adults. This study used eye tracking technique to examine young adults' and highly educated older adults' attention toward two types of decision-relevant information: heuristic cue vs. factual cues. Surprisingly, highly educated older adults showed the reversed age pattern-they looked more toward factual cues than did young adults. This age difference disappeared after controlling for educational level. Additionally, education correlated with attentional pattern to decision-relevant information. We interpret this finding as an indication of the power of education: education may modify what are thought to be "typical" age differences in decision-making, and education may influence young and older people's decision-making via different paths.

摘要

以往的研究表明,与年轻人相比,老年人更倾向于采用启发式决策。本研究使用眼动追踪技术,考察了年轻人和高学历老年人对两种与决策相关信息的关注情况:启发式线索与事实性线索。令人惊讶的是,高学历老年人呈现出相反的年龄模式——他们比年轻人更关注事实性线索。在控制教育水平后,这种年龄差异消失了。此外,教育与对决策相关信息的注意模式相关。我们将这一发现解释为教育力量的一种体现:教育可能会改变人们认为的决策中“典型”的年龄差异,并且教育可能通过不同途径影响年轻人和老年人的决策。

相似文献

1
Age differences in attention toward decision-relevant information: education matters.对决策相关信息的注意力方面的年龄差异:教育很重要。
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2011;73(4):299-312. doi: 10.2190/AG.73.4.b.
2
Effects of anger and sadness on attentional patterns in decision making: an eye-tracking study.愤怒和悲伤对决策中注意力模式的影响:一项眼动追踪研究。
Psychol Rep. 2014 Feb;114(1):50-67. doi: 10.2466/01.04.PR0.114k14w3.
3
Understanding active sampling strategies: Empirical approaches and implications for attention and decision research.理解主动采样策略:注意力和决策研究的实证方法及启示。
Cortex. 2018 May;102:150-160. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.08.019. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
4
Eye movements reveal memory processes during similarity- and rule-based decision making.眼球运动揭示了基于相似性和规则的决策过程中的记忆过程。
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:228-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.019. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
5
When irrelevance matters: Stimulus-response binding in decision making under uncertainty.当不相关因素起作用时:不确定性决策中的刺激-反应联结
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Nov;41(6):1831-48. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000109. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
6
How Are Online Health Messages Processed? Using Eye Tracking to Predict Recall of Information in Younger and Older Adults.在线健康信息是如何被处理的?利用眼动追踪技术预测年轻人和老年人对信息的回忆。
J Health Commun. 2016;21(4):387-96. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1080327. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
7
The role of eye movements in decision making and the prospect of exposure effects.眼球运动在决策中的作用及曝光效应的前景。
Vision Res. 2012 May 1;60:16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.02.014. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
8
Eye movement correlates of younger and older adults' strategies for complex addition.年轻人和老年人复杂加法策略的眼动相关性
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2007 Jul;125(3):257-78. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.08.001. Epub 2006 Sep 27.
9
Evidence for top-down control of eye movements during visual decision making.视觉决策过程中眼动自上而下控制的证据。
J Vis. 2010 May 1;10(5):15. doi: 10.1167/10.5.15.
10
Aging and goal-directed emotional attention: distraction reverses emotional biases.衰老与目标导向的情绪注意力:分心会扭转情绪偏差。
Emotion. 2007 Nov;7(4):705-14. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.705.

引用本文的文献

1
Utilizing Sensory and Visual Data in the Value Estimation of Extra Virgin Olive Oil.利用感官和视觉数据评估特级初榨橄榄油的价值
Foods. 2024 Sep 13;13(18):2904. doi: 10.3390/foods13182904.
2
Facial Trustworthiness Influences Age Differences in Visual Attention Toward Credible Versus Non-credible Messages.面部可信度影响对可信与不可信信息视觉关注的年龄差异。
Innov Aging. 2023 Jun 9;7(5):igad051. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igad051. eCollection 2023.