AlGhazali N, Jarad F D, Smith P W, Preston A J
Liverpool University Dental Hospital.
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2012 Mar;20(1):3-9.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in colour between dental porcelain and porcelain-repairing resin composites. Porcelain discs were fabricated using four dentine shades in 1mm and 2mm thicknesses. Another series of discs was fabricated in 1mm and 2 mm thicknesses using three different brands of composite. Four single shades were used for the 1mm thick discs, and four single and 12 combined shades for the 2mm thick discs. The colour was measured using a spectrophotometer and colour differences deltaE* were calculated between samples. Colour differences were in the range of (deltaE* = 3.5-26.9), above the accepted threshold for perceptibility (deltaE* > 1) with a number above the threshold for what is considered to be clinically acceptable (deltaE* > 5.5). Improvements in colour match were seen for certain shade combinations of repairing composites, in contrast to when a single shade of composite was used.
本研究的目的是评估牙科烤瓷材料与烤瓷修复树脂复合材料之间的颜色差异。使用四种牙本质色号制作了厚度为1毫米和2毫米的瓷盘。使用三种不同品牌的复合材料制作了另一组厚度为1毫米和2毫米的圆盘。1毫米厚的圆盘使用了四种单一色号,2毫米厚的圆盘使用了四种单一色号和12种混合色号。使用分光光度计测量颜色,并计算样品之间的色差ΔE*。色差范围为(ΔE* = 3.5 - 26.9),高于可察觉性的公认阈值(ΔE* > 1),且高于临床可接受范围的阈值(ΔE* > 5.5)。与使用单一色号的复合材料相比,某些修复复合材料的色号组合在颜色匹配方面有改善。