Suppr超能文献

基于全瓷氧化锆修复体的三种不同瓷系统颜色匹配的分光光度评估。

Spectrophotometric evaluation of color match of three different porcelain systems for all-ceramic zirconia-based restorations.

作者信息

Vichi Alessandro, Fazi Giovanni, Carrabba Michele, Corciolani Gabriele, Louca Chris, Ferrari Marco

机构信息

Tuscan School of Dental Medicine, Department of Dental Materials and Fixed Prosthodontics of Siena, University of Florence and Siena, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Dent. 2012 Aug;25(4):191-4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine by a spectrophotometric analysis the variations in color between the intended and the fabricated shades of three different porcelain systems when applied in a standardized thickness on a zirconia core.

METHODS

Three porcelain systems for zirconia based restorations, Ivoclar IPS e.max Ceram, VITA VM9, and Creation Zi-F were tested. Nine disc-shaped (15 mm diameter, 0.5 mm thickness) specimens of VITA YZ zirconia core per group were made comprising a total of 27 discs. Three different shades (A2, A3, A4) of the Vitapan Classical shade guide were investigated. The porcelain veneer total thickness was set at 1.0 mm in all groups. The porcelain stratification was made by applying calibrated layers of porcelain. Thicknesses of single porcelain layers were calculated from drawings retrieved from the manufacturers' instructions. Color parameters (L*, a*, b*) of veneered specimens were measured by a clinical spectrophotometer. Color differences (deltaE) were calculated using a color difference formula. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

The mean color differences for the three ceramic systems, Ivoclar IPS e.max Ceram, VITA VM9 and Creation Zi-F were respectively 4.1, 2.7 and 3.2, regardless of the shades. VITA VM9 resulted in the best average shade matching among the porcelain systems, even if results with shade A3 were considerably worse than shades with A2 and A4 (P<0.05). Color matching appeared not to be shade dependent (P>0.05) among the tested shades.

摘要

目的

通过分光光度分析,确定三种不同瓷系统在氧化锆核上以标准化厚度应用时,预期色泽与制作出的色泽之间的差异。

方法

测试了三种用于氧化锆基修复体的瓷系统,即义获嘉IPS e.max Ceram、维他VM9和创彩Zi-F。每组制作9个圆盘形(直径15毫米,厚度0.5毫米)的维他YZ氧化锆核标本,共27个圆盘。研究了维他经典比色板的三种不同色泽(A2、A3、A4)。所有组的瓷贴面总厚度均设定为1.0毫米。通过涂抹校准厚度的瓷层进行瓷分层。根据从制造商说明书中获取的图纸计算单个瓷层的厚度。使用临床分光光度计测量贴面标本的颜色参数(L*、a*、b*)。使用色差公式计算色差(ΔE)。采用双向方差分析和Tukey检验分析数据。

结果

无论色泽如何,义获嘉IPS e.max Ceram、维他VM9和创彩Zi-F这三种陶瓷系统的平均色差分别为4.1、2.7和3.2。在瓷系统中,维他VM9的平均色泽匹配最佳,即使A3色泽的结果比A2和A4色泽的结果差得多(P<0.05)。在所测试的色泽中,颜色匹配似乎与色泽无关(P>0.05)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验