• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项前瞻性研究,旨在证明两种特定于手术的评估工具在评估腹腔镜结直肠手术手术能力方面的可靠性和有效性。

A prospective study demonstrating the reliability and validity of two procedure-specific evaluation tools to assess operative competence in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

机构信息

University of Toronto, 600 University Ave, Rm. 440, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2012 Sep;26(9):2489-503. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2220-9. Epub 2012 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-012-2220-9
PMID:22476826
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is considered an advanced minimally invasive procedure with a long, variable learning curve. Developing an evaluation tool is essential to ensure that individuals reach a certain level of competence prior to performing this procedure independently. To achieve standardization and wide implementation, an assessment tool must be reflective of practice across many institutions.

STUDY DESIGN

The purpose of this study is to validate two procedure-specific evaluation tools for laparoscopic colorectal surgery that were developed using innovative consensus methodology. Two procedure-specific rating scales for laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomy were created using the Delphi method. Nine novice and nine expert laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy videos were prospectively collected, and nine novice and ten expert laparoscopic right colectomy videos were recorded. The experts rated the videos using the procedure-specific technical skills evaluation tool for either laparoscopic right colectomy or laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences between the expert and novice scores on the laparoscopic right colectomy evaluation tool: the median score of novices was 63.8% and the expert score was 73.1% (p = 0.02). Similarly, there was a significant difference between the median novice score on the sigmoid tool (58.6%) compared with the median expert score (70.7%) (p = 0.003). Cronbach's alpha was 0.82 for the right colectomy evaluation tool and 0.79 for the sigmoid rating scale.

CONCLUSIONS

The procedure-specific evaluation tools for laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomy demonstrate strong reliability and construct validity, and have the potential to be used for technical skills assessment and feedback.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜结直肠手术被认为是一种先进的微创手术,具有较长且可变的学习曲线。开发评估工具对于确保个人在独立执行该手术之前达到一定的能力水平至关重要。为了实现标准化和广泛实施,评估工具必须反映许多机构的实践情况。

研究设计

本研究的目的是验证两种使用创新共识方法开发的腹腔镜结直肠手术专用评估工具。使用 Delphi 方法创建了两种用于腹腔镜右半结肠切除术和乙状结肠切除术的特定手术评分量表。前瞻性收集了 9 个新手和 9 个专家腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术视频,以及 9 个新手和 10 个专家腹腔镜右半结肠切除术视频。专家使用特定于手术的腹腔镜右半结肠切除术或腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术的技术技能评估工具对视频进行评分。

结果

在腹腔镜右半结肠切除术评估工具上,专家和新手的评分存在统计学显著差异:新手的中位数评分为 63.8%,专家的评分为 73.1%(p=0.02)。同样,在乙状结肠工具上,新手的中位数评分(58.6%)与专家的中位数评分(70.7%)之间存在显著差异(p=0.003)。右半结肠切除术评估工具的 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.82,乙状结肠评分量表的 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.79。

结论

腹腔镜右半结肠和乙状结肠切除术的特定手术评估工具具有很强的可靠性和结构有效性,并且有可能用于技术技能评估和反馈。

相似文献

1
A prospective study demonstrating the reliability and validity of two procedure-specific evaluation tools to assess operative competence in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.一项前瞻性研究,旨在证明两种特定于手术的评估工具在评估腹腔镜结直肠手术手术能力方面的可靠性和有效性。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Sep;26(9):2489-503. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2220-9. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
2
Development of an objective evaluation tool to assess technical skill in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a Delphi methodology.开发一种用于评估腹腔镜结直肠手术技术技能的客观评估工具:德尔菲法。
Am J Surg. 2011 Feb;201(2):251-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.01.031. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
3
The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Assessment Tool for Performance of Laparoscopic Colectomy.美国结肠和直肠外科医师学会腹腔镜结肠切除术操作评估工具
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Jul;60(7):738-744. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000817.
4
Feasibility of self-appraisal in assessing operative performance in advanced laparoscopic colorectal surgery.自我评估在评估高级腹腔镜结直肠手术操作绩效中的可行性。
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Jul;13(7):805-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02271.x. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
5
Construct validation of a novel hybrid virtual-reality simulator for training and assessing laparoscopic colectomy; results from the first course for experienced senior laparoscopic surgeons.一种用于培训和评估腹腔镜结肠切除术的新型混合虚拟现实模拟器的结构效度验证:经验丰富的高级腹腔镜外科医生首期课程的结果
Surg Endosc. 2008 Oct;22(10):2301-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9900-5. Epub 2008 Jun 14.
6
Observational clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) for competency assessment in laparoscopic colorectal surgery at the specialist level.观察性临床人体可靠性分析(OCHRA)在专科腹腔镜结直肠手术中的能力评估。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar;26(3):796-803. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1955-z. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
7
Training value of laparoscopic colorectal videos on the World Wide Web: a pilot study on the educational quality of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy videos.腹腔镜结直肠视频在万维网上的培训价值:腹腔镜右半结肠切除术视频教育质量的初步研究。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Nov;31(11):4496-4504. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5504-2. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
8
Virtual reality simulator training for laparoscopic colectomy: what metrics have construct validity?虚拟现实模拟器训练在腹腔镜结直肠切除术中的应用:哪些指标具有构建效度?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Feb;57(2):210-4. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000031.
9
Procedural key steps in laparoscopic colorectal surgery, consensus through Delphi methodology.腹腔镜结直肠手术的关键步骤:通过德尔菲法达成的共识
Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep;29(9):2620-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3979-7. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
10
Assessing operative performance in advanced laparoscopic colorectal surgery.评估腹腔镜结直肠手术的手术操作表现。
World J Surg. 2010 Jul;34(7):1594-603. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0486-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Objective Assessment of Ergonomics and Performance of Thoracic Surgeons During Real-Life Anatomical Robotic Pulmonary Resections.现实生活中解剖学机器人辅助肺切除术中胸外科医生的人体工程学与操作表现的客观评估
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025 Aug 5;40(8). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaf180.
2
The Trauma Training Score: A Novel and Objective Method for Performance Evaluation.创伤培训评分:一种用于绩效评估的新颖且客观的方法。
Cureus. 2024 Nov 20;16(11):e74102. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74102. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
ESGE/ESGO/SERGS consensus statement on surgical steps in minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology: transperitoneal and extraperitioneal approach for paraaortic lymphadenectomy.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of an objective evaluation tool to assess technical skill in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a Delphi methodology.开发一种用于评估腹腔镜结直肠手术技术技能的客观评估工具:德尔菲法。
Am J Surg. 2011 Feb;201(2):251-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.01.031. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
2
Assessment and feedback in the skills laboratory and operating room.技能实验室和手术室的评估和反馈。
Surg Clin North Am. 2010 Jun;90(3):519-33. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2010.02.009.
3
Assessing operative performance in advanced laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
ESGE/ESGO/SERGS 关于妇科肿瘤学微创外科手术步骤的共识声明:腹盆腔和腹膜外途径用于腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除术。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 Nov 4;34(11):1673-1676. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005796.
4
Training and assessment for colorectal surgery and appendicectomy- a systematic review.结直肠外科和阑尾切除术的培训和评估-系统评价。
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Apr;26(4):597-608. doi: 10.1111/codi.16905. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
5
Video-based tools for surgical quality assessment of technical skills in laparoscopic procedures: a systematic review.基于视频的腹腔镜手术技术技能质量评估工具:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4279-4297. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10076-z. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
6
Assessment methods in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review of available instruments.腹腔镜结直肠手术中的评估方法:现有工具的系统评价。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Apr 19;38(1):105. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04395-9.
7
Validation and reliability testing of a rating scale for objective assessment of performance in laparoscopic appendicectomy surgery.验证和可靠性测试一种用于腹腔镜阑尾切除术手术绩效客观评估的评分量表。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Jul;92(7-8):1731-1736. doi: 10.1111/ans.17862. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
8
The Future in Standards of Care for Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery to Improve Training and Education.改善培训与教育的妇科腹腔镜手术护理标准的未来。
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 14;11(8):2192. doi: 10.3390/jcm11082192.
9
How can surgical skills in laparoscopic colon surgery be objectively assessed?-a scoping review.腹腔镜结肠手术的外科技能如何进行客观评估?——范围综述。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):1761-1774. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08914-z. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
10
Development of a novel educational tool to assess skills in laparoscopic liver surgery using the Delphi methodology: the laparoscopic liver skills scale (LLSS).运用德尔菲法开发一种用于评估腹腔镜肝脏手术技能的新型教育工具:腹腔镜肝脏技能量表(LLSS)。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Apr;36(4):2321-2333. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08507-w. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
评估腹腔镜结直肠手术的手术操作表现。
World J Surg. 2010 Jul;34(7):1594-603. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0486-4.
4
Objective structured assessment of technical skills for repair of fourth-degree perineal lacerations.会阴Ⅳ度裂伤修复技术技能的客观结构化评估
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;199(6):676.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.054.
5
Procedural performance in gastrointestinal endoscopy: an assessment and self-appraisal tool.胃肠内镜检查中的操作表现:一种评估与自我评估工具。
Am J Surg. 2008 Sep;196(3):450-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.10.024. Epub 2008 Jun 30.
6
Objective assessment of surgical competence in gynaecological laparoscopy: development and validation of a procedure-specific rating scale.妇科腹腔镜手术操作能力的客观评估:一种特定手术评级量表的制定与验证
BJOG. 2008 Jun;115(7):908-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01732.x.
7
Medial-to-lateral laparoscopic colon resection: a view beyond the learning curve.腹腔镜内侧至外侧结肠切除术:超越学习曲线的视角
Surg Endosc. 2007 Sep;21(9):1503-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9085-8. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
8
An evaluation of the feasibility, validity, and reliability of laparoscopic skills assessment in the operating room.手术室中腹腔镜技能评估的可行性、有效性和可靠性评估。
Ann Surg. 2007 Jun;245(6):992-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000262780.17950.e5.
9
Assessment of operative competence during carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术术中操作能力评估
Br J Surg. 2007 Jun;94(6):726-30. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5689.
10
Technical skills examination for general surgical trainees.普通外科住院医师技术技能考核
Br J Surg. 2006 Sep;93(9):1139-46. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5330.