Suppr超能文献

虚拟现实模拟器训练在腹腔镜结直肠切除术中的应用:哪些指标具有构建效度?

Virtual reality simulator training for laparoscopic colectomy: what metrics have construct validity?

机构信息

1Division of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio 2Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France 3Division of Colorectal Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 4Division of Colorectal Surgery, Veterans Administration Gulf Coast Veterans Health Care System, Biloxi, Mississippi.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Feb;57(2):210-4. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000031.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic colectomy has been used for training of surgical residents and has been considered as a model for technical skills assessment of board-eligible colorectal surgeons. However, construct validity (the ability to distinguish between skill levels) must be confirmed before widespread implementation.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to specifically determine which metrics for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy have evidence of construct validity.

DESIGN

General surgeons that had performed fewer than 30 laparoscopic colon resections and laparoscopic colorectal experts (>200 laparoscopic colon resections) performed laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy on the LAP Mentor model. All participants received a 15-minute instructional warm-up and had never used the simulator before the study. Performance was then compared between each group for 21 metrics (procedural, 14; intraoperative errors, 7) to determine specifically which measurements demonstrate construct validity. Performance was compared with the Mann-Whitney U-test (p < 0.05 was significant).

RESULTS

Fifty-three surgeons; 29 general surgeons, and 24 colorectal surgeons enrolled in the study. The virtual reality simulators for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy demonstrated construct validity for 8 of 14 procedural metrics by distinguishing levels of surgical experience (p < 0.05). The most discriminatory procedural metrics (p < 0.01) favoring experts were reduced instrument path length, accuracy of the peritoneal/medial mobilization, and dissection of the inferior mesenteric artery. Intraoperative errors were not discriminatory for most metrics and favored general surgeons for colonic wall injury (general surgeons, 0.7; colorectal surgeons, 3.5; p = 0.045).

LIMITATIONS

Individual variability within the general surgeon and colorectal surgeon groups was not accounted for.

CONCLUSIONS

The virtual reality simulators for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy demonstrated construct validity for 8 procedure-specific metrics. However, using virtual reality simulator metrics to detect intraoperative errors did not discriminate between groups. If the virtual reality simulator continues to be used for the technical assessment of trainees and board-eligible surgeons, the evaluation of performance should be limited to procedural metrics.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜结直肠切除术的虚拟现实模拟已被用于培训外科住院医师,并被认为是评估有资格参加委员会考试的结直肠外科医生技术技能的模型。然而,在广泛实施之前,必须确认其构效关系(区分技能水平的能力)。

目的

本研究旨在专门确定腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术的哪些度量标准具有构效关系的证据。

设计

进行腹腔镜结肠切除术少于 30 例的普通外科医生和腹腔镜结直肠专家(>200 例腹腔镜结肠切除术)在 LAP Mentor 模型上进行腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术。所有参与者都接受了 15 分钟的指导热身,并且在研究之前从未使用过模拟器。然后,将每个组的 21 个度量标准(程序,14 个;术中错误,7 个)进行比较,以确定具体哪些测量结果具有构效关系。使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验进行性能比较(p < 0.05 为显著)。

结果

共有 53 名外科医生;29 名普通外科医生和 24 名结直肠外科医生参加了这项研究。腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术的虚拟现实模拟器通过区分手术经验水平,证明了 14 项程序度量标准中的 8 项具有构效关系(p < 0.05)。最具区分力的程序度量标准(p < 0.01)有利于专家,包括减少器械路径长度、腹膜/内侧移动的准确性和肠系膜下动脉的分离。术中错误对大多数指标都没有区别,并且结肠壁损伤有利于普通外科医生(普通外科医生,0.7;结直肠外科医生,3.5;p = 0.045)。

局限性

未考虑普通外科医生和结直肠外科医生组内的个体差异。

结论

腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术的虚拟现实模拟器对 8 项特定于程序的度量标准具有构效关系。然而,使用虚拟现实模拟器指标来检测术中错误并不能区分组间差异。如果虚拟现实模拟器继续用于培训生和有资格参加委员会考试的外科医生的技术评估,则应将绩效评估仅限于程序度量标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验