• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜结肠手术的外科技能如何进行客观评估?——范围综述。

How can surgical skills in laparoscopic colon surgery be objectively assessed?-a scoping review.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Herning, Denmark.

Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):1761-1774. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08914-z. Epub 2021 Dec 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-021-08914-z
PMID:34873653
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8847271/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In laparoscopic colorectal surgery, higher technical skills have been associated with improved patient outcome. With the growing interest in laparoscopic techniques, pressure on surgeons and certifying bodies is mounting to ensure that operative procedures are performed safely and efficiently. The aim of the present review was to comprehensively identify tools for skill assessment in laparoscopic colon surgery and to assess their validity as reported in the literature.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in EMBASE and PubMed/MEDLINE in May 2021 to identify studies examining technical skills assessment tools in laparoscopic colon surgery. Available information on validity evidence (content, response process, internal structure, relation to other variables, and consequences) was evaluated for all included tools.

RESULTS

Fourteen assessment tools were identified, of which most were procedure-specific and video-based. Most tools reported moderate validity evidence. Commonly not reported were rater training, assessment correlation with variables other than training level, and validity reproducibility and reliability in external educational settings.

CONCLUSION

The results of this review show that several tools are available for evaluation of laparoscopic colon cancer surgery, but few authors present substantial validity for tool development and use. As we move towards the implementation of new techniques in laparoscopic colon surgery, it is imperative to establish validity before surgical skill assessment tools can be applied to new procedures and settings. Therefore, future studies ought to examine different aspects of tool validity, especially correlation with other variables, such as patient morbidity and pathological reports, which impact patient survival.

摘要

背景

在腹腔镜结直肠手术中,较高的技术水平与改善患者预后相关。随着对腹腔镜技术兴趣的增加,对外科医生和认证机构的压力也越来越大,以确保手术操作的安全和高效。本综述的目的是全面确定腹腔镜结肠手术中技能评估的工具,并评估其在文献中的有效性。

方法

2021 年 5 月,在 EMBASE 和 PubMed/MEDLINE 中进行了系统检索,以确定研究腹腔镜结肠手术中技术技能评估工具的研究。对所有纳入的工具,评估了有效性证据(内容、反应过程、内部结构、与其他变量的关系和后果)的可用信息。

结果

确定了 14 种评估工具,其中大多数是特定于程序的和基于视频的。大多数工具报告了中等有效性证据。通常未报告的是评估者的培训、评估与培训水平以外的变量的相关性,以及在外部教育环境中的有效性可重复性和可靠性。

结论

本综述的结果表明,有几种工具可用于评估腹腔镜结肠癌手术,但很少有作者提出实质性的工具开发和使用有效性。随着新的腹腔镜结肠手术技术的实施,在手术技能评估工具能够应用于新的程序和环境之前,必须先建立有效性。因此,未来的研究应该检查工具有效性的不同方面,特别是与其他变量(如患者发病率和病理报告)的相关性,这些变量会影响患者的生存。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6831/8847271/40e416a55d72/464_2021_8914_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6831/8847271/40e416a55d72/464_2021_8914_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6831/8847271/40e416a55d72/464_2021_8914_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
How can surgical skills in laparoscopic colon surgery be objectively assessed?-a scoping review.腹腔镜结肠手术的外科技能如何进行客观评估?——范围综述。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):1761-1774. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08914-z. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
2
Assessment of surgical performance of laparoscopic benign hiatal surgery: a systematic review.腹腔镜良性食管裂孔疝手术的手术绩效评估:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Nov;33(11):3798-3805. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06662-9. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
3
A systematic review of performance assessment tools for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术性能评估工具的系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):832-44. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4285-8. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
4
Video-based tools for surgical quality assessment of technical skills in laparoscopic procedures: a systematic review.基于视频的腹腔镜手术技术技能质量评估工具:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4279-4297. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10076-z. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
5
Objective assessment tools in laparoscopic or robotic-assisted gynecological surgery: A systematic review.腹腔镜或机器人辅助妇科手术中的客观评估工具:系统评价。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Aug;103(8):1480-1497. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14840. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
6
Technical skills assessment toolbox: a review using the unitary framework of validity.技术技能评估工具箱:基于效标关联效度的综合评价
Ann Surg. 2015 Feb;261(2):251-62. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000520.
7
Training and assessment using the LapSim laparoscopic simulator: a scoping review of validity evidence.使用LapSim腹腔镜模拟器进行培训与评估:有效性证据的范围综述
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):1658-1671. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09593-0. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
8
Video-based assessment for laparoscopic fundoplication: initial development of a robust tool for operative performance assessment.基于视频的腹腔镜胃底折叠术评估:手术绩效评估的强大工具的初步开发。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):3176-3183. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07089-y. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
9
Evaluation of objective tools and artificial intelligence in robotic surgery technical skills assessment: a systematic review.评价机器人手术技术评估中的客观工具和人工智能:系统评价。
Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3;111(1). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad331.
10
Validity Evidence for Procedure-specific Competence Assessment Tools in General Surgery: A Scoping Review.普通外科中基于具体操作的能力评估工具的有效性证据:范围综述。
Ann Surg. 2022 Mar 1;275(3):482-487. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005207.

引用本文的文献

1
Vascular pedicle dissection time in laparoscopic colectomies as a novel marker of surgical skill: a prospective cohort study.腹腔镜结肠切除术中血管蒂解剖时间作为手术技巧的新指标:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 Mar 22;29(1):82. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03121-7.
2
Objective assessment tools in laparoscopic or robotic-assisted gynecological surgery: A systematic review.腹腔镜或机器人辅助妇科手术中的客观评估工具:系统评价。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Aug;103(8):1480-1497. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14840. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
3
Training and assessment for colorectal surgery and appendicectomy- a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Association Between Surgeon Technical Skills and Patient Outcomes.外科医生技术技能与患者预后的关系。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Oct 1;155(10):960-968. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3007.
2
Automated laparoscopic colorectal surgery workflow recognition using artificial intelligence: Experimental research.使用人工智能进行自动化腹腔镜结直肠手术工作流程识别:实验研究。
Int J Surg. 2020 Jul;79:88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.05.015. Epub 2020 May 12.
3
Association of Surgical Skill Assessment With Clinical Outcomes in Cancer Surgery.手术技能评估与癌症手术临床结果的关联。
结直肠外科和阑尾切除术的培训和评估-系统评价。
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Apr;26(4):597-608. doi: 10.1111/codi.16905. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
4
Video-based tools for surgical quality assessment of technical skills in laparoscopic procedures: a systematic review.基于视频的腹腔镜手术技术技能质量评估工具:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4279-4297. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10076-z. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
5
Development of a procedure-specific tool for skill assessment in left- and right-sided laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision.开发一种特定于程序的工具,用于评估左、右侧腹腔镜完全结肠系膜切除术的技能。
Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jan;25(1):31-43. doi: 10.1111/codi.16317. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jul 1;155(7):590-598. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1004.
4
Development and validation of a recommended checklist for assessment of surgical videos quality: the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool.腹腔镜手术视频教育指南(LAP-VEGaS)视频评估工具:推荐的手术视频质量评估检查表的制定和验证。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1362-1369. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07517-4. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
5
Rating of camera navigation skills in colorectal surgery.结直肠外科中摄像导航技能的评估。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jun;35(6):1111-1115. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03543-9. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
6
The impact of rater training on the psychometric properties of standardized surgical skill assessment tools.评价者培训对标准化手术技能评估工具的心理测量学特性的影响。
Am J Surg. 2020 Sep;220(3):610-615. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.01.019. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
7
Stepwise Training in Laparoscopic Surgery for Complex Ileocolonic Crohn's Disease: Analysis of 127 Training Episodes.腹腔镜手术治疗复杂回结肠克罗恩病的阶梯式培训:127 个培训病例分析。
J Surg Educ. 2019 Sep-Oct;76(5):1364-1369. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
8
Proposal of a new classification system for complete mesocolic excison in right-sided colon cancer.提出一种新的右半结肠癌完整结肠系膜切除术的分类系统。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Mar;23(3):251-257. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-01949-4. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
9
Effect of rater training on the reliability of technical skill assessments: a randomized controlled trial.评分者培训对技术技能评估可靠性的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Can J Surg. 2018 Oct 1;61(6):15917. doi: 10.1503/cjs.015917.
10
Association of Plane of Total Mesorectal Excision With Prognosis of Rectal Cancer: Secondary Analysis of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.全直肠系膜切除平面与直肠癌预后的关系:CAO/ARO/AIO-04 期随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Aug 1;153(8):e181607. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1607. Epub 2018 Aug 15.