Suppr超能文献

手术培训成本:腹腔镜胆囊切除术手术时间分析。

The cost of surgical training: analysis of operative time for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Basel University Hospital, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2012 Sep;26(9):2579-86. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2236-1. Epub 2012 Apr 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Duration of surgery is a main cost factor of surgical training. The purpose of this analysis of operative times for laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC) was to quantify the extra time and related costs in regards to the surgeons' experience in the operating room (OR).

METHODS

All LC performed between January 01, 2005 and December 31, 2008 in 46 hospitals reporting to the database of the Swiss Association for Quality Management in Surgery (AQC) were analyzed (n = 10,010). Four levels of seniority were specified: resident (R), junior consultant (JC), senior consultant (SC), and attending surgeon (AS). The differences in operative time according to seniority were investigated in a multivariable log-linear and median regression analysis controlling for possible confounders. The OR costs were calculated by using a full cost rate in a teaching hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 9,208 LC were available for analysis; 802 had to be excluded due to missing data (n = 212) or secondary major operations (n = 590). Twenty-eight percent of the LC were performed by R as teaching operations (n = 2,591). Compared with R, the multivariable analysis of operative time showed a median difference of -2.5 min (-9.0; 4.8) for JC and -18 min (-25; -11) for SC and -28 min (-35; -10) for AS, respectively. The OR minute costs were 17.57, resulting in incremental costs of 492 (159; 615) per operation in case of tutorial assistance.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of LC performed as tutorial assistance for R remains low. Surgical training in the OR causes relevant case-related extra time and therefore costs.

摘要

背景

手术时间是手术培训的主要成本因素。本分析旨在量化腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)手术时间与外科医生手术室(OR)经验之间的关系。

方法

分析了瑞士质量管理协会(AQC)数据库中 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2008 年 12 月 31 日期间在 46 家医院进行的所有 LC(n=10010)。指定了四级职称:住院医师(R)、初级顾问(JC)、高级顾问(SC)和主治外科医生(AS)。通过多变量对数线性和中位数回归分析控制可能的混杂因素,研究了根据职称的手术时间差异。通过在教学医院使用全成本费率计算 OR 成本。

结果

共有 9208 例 LC 可用于分析;由于数据缺失(n=212)或二次主要手术(n=590),有 802 例被排除在外。28%的 LC 是由 R 作为教学手术完成的(n=2591)。与 R 相比,手术时间的多变量分析显示,JC 的中位差异为-2.5 分钟(-9.0;4.8),SC 为-18 分钟(-25;-11),AS 为-28 分钟(-35;-10)。OR 分钟成本为<欧元>17.57,因此,在教程辅助的情况下,每次手术的增量成本为<欧元>492(159;615)。

结论

R 作为教学辅助进行的 LC 比例仍然较低。OR 中的外科培训会导致相关的额外时间和因此产生的成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验