• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在多目标跟踪过程中重新分配注意力。

Reallocating attention during multiple object tracking.

作者信息

Ericson Justin M, Christensen James C

机构信息

Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, 2255 H Street B248, Dayton, OH 45433, USA.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jul;74(5):831-40. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0294-z.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-012-0294-z
PMID:22477020
Abstract

Wolfe, Place, and Horowitz (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14:344-349, 2007) found that participants were relatively unaffected by selecting and deselecting targets while performing a multiple object tracking task, such that maintaining tracking was possible for longer durations than the few seconds typically studied. Though this result was generally consistent with other findings on tracking duration (Franconeri, Jonathon, & Scimeca Psychological Science 21:920-925, 2010), it was inconsistent with research involving cuing paradigms, specifically precues (Pylyshyn & Annan Spatial Vision 19:485-504, 2006). In the present research, we broke down the addition and removal of targets into separate conditions and incorporated a simple performance model to evaluate the costs associated with the selection and deselection of moving targets. Across three experiments, we demonstrated evidence against a cost being associated with any shift in attention, but rather that varying the type of cue used for target deselection produces no additional cost to performance and that hysteresis effects are not induced by a reduction in tracking load.

摘要

沃尔夫、普莱斯和霍洛维茨(《心理onomic通报与评论》14:344 - 349,2007年)发现,在执行多目标跟踪任务时,参与者选择和取消选择目标对其影响相对较小,以至于能够比通常研究的短短几秒更长时间地维持跟踪。尽管这一结果总体上与其他关于跟踪持续时间的研究结果一致(弗兰科内里、乔纳森和西梅卡,《心理科学》21:920 - 925,2010年),但与涉及提示范式的研究,特别是预提示研究不一致(皮利欣和安南,《空间视觉》19:485 - 504,2006年)。在本研究中,我们将目标的添加和移除分解为不同条件,并纳入一个简单的表现模型来评估与移动目标的选择和取消选择相关的成本。在三个实验中,我们证明没有证据表明注意力的任何转移会带来成本,而是目标取消选择所使用的提示类型的变化不会给表现带来额外成本,并且跟踪负荷的降低不会引发滞后效应。

相似文献

1
Reallocating attention during multiple object tracking.在多目标跟踪过程中重新分配注意力。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jul;74(5):831-40. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0294-z.
2
The what-where trade-off in multiple-identity tracking.多重身份追踪中的“什么-哪里”权衡
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Jul;73(5):1422-34. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0089-7.
3
The impact of multiple irrelevant visual events at the same spatial location on inhibition.同一空间位置上多个不相关视觉事件对抑制作用的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Feb;71(2):392-402. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.2.392.
4
Measuring the interrelations among multiple paradigms of visual attention: an individual differences approach.测量多种视觉注意范式之间的相互关系:一种个体差异方法。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Apr;38(2):414-28. doi: 10.1037/a0026314. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
5
Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.非自愿的隐蔽定向取决于注意力控制设置。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 Nov;18(4):1030-44.
6
Variations in the magnitude of attentional capture: testing a two-process model.注意捕获程度的变化:对双过程模型的检验
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Feb;72(2):342-52. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.2.342.
7
Spatial and visuospatial working memory tests predict performance in classic multiple-object tracking in young adults, but nonspatial measures of the executive do not.空间和视觉空间工作记忆测试能够预测年轻人在经典多目标追踪任务中的表现,但执行功能的非空间测量指标则不能。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Feb;74(2):300-11. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0235-2.
8
Multisensory cues capture spatial attention regardless of perceptual load.多感官线索会捕获空间注意力,而与知觉负载无关。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Dec;33(6):1311-21. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1311.
9
Neural measures of dynamic changes in attentive tracking load.注意跟踪负荷动态变化的神经测量。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Feb;24(2):440-50. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00107. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
10
Close encounters of the distracting kind: identifying the cause of visual tracking errors.令人分心的近距离接触:识别视觉追踪误差的原因。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 May;74(4):703-15. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0260-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Stroboscopic Vision When Interacting With Multiple Moving Objects: Perturbation Is Not the Same as Elimination.与多个移动物体交互时的频闪视觉:扰动不同于消除。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 25;9:1290. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01290. eCollection 2018.