Mabry J H
Anal Verbal Behav. 1993;11:77-88. doi: 10.1007/BF03392889.
The strong tradition of "school room" grammars may have had a negative influence on the reception given a functional analysis of verbal behavior, both within and without the field of behavior analysis. Some of the failings of those traditional grammars, and their largely prescriptive nature were outlined through reference to other critics, and conflicting views. Skinner's own treatment of grammatical issues was presented, emphasizing his view of a functional unit and his use of the autoclitic and intraverbal functions to describe alternatives to a formal or structural analysis. Finally, the relevance of stimulus control variables to some recurring questions about verbal behavior and, specifically grammar, were mentioned.
“课堂式”语法的强大传统可能对行为分析领域内外对言语行为功能分析的接受度产生了负面影响。通过参考其他批评者和相互冲突的观点,概述了那些传统语法的一些缺陷及其主要的规定性本质。介绍了斯金纳本人对语法问题的处理方式,强调了他对功能单元的看法以及他使用自附语和内言功能来描述形式或结构分析的替代方法。最后,提到了刺激控制变量与一些关于言语行为特别是语法的反复出现的问题的相关性。