Bickel W K, Etzel B C
J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Sep;44(2):245-70. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-245.
This paper is a selective review of research that addresses the validity of two interpretations of stimulus generalization. One interpretation, referred to as the descriptive stimulus-control interpretation, proposes that during stimulus generalization a continuous relation exists between stimulus and response dimensions. The other interpretation, referred to as the quantal interpretation, proposes that a stimulus-response relation functions as a unit that may or may not occur. From the latter viewpoint, the continuity typically obtained during generalization tests is deemed to be artifactual and to result from averaging across multiple controlling stimulus-response relations. Studies examining the contribution of these multiple relations to generalization gradients are reviewed. With few exceptions, the quantal interpretation appears to better characterize the results of these studies. Implications for peak shift, selection of analytical level, and identification of the behavioral unit are discussed, as well as factors that may determine the acceptability of the quantal interpretation.
本文是一篇选择性综述,内容涉及对刺激泛化两种解释的有效性的研究。一种解释被称为描述性刺激控制解释,它提出在刺激泛化过程中,刺激维度和反应维度之间存在连续关系。另一种解释被称为量子解释,它提出刺激-反应关系作为一个单元起作用,该单元可能发生也可能不发生。从后一种观点来看,泛化测试中通常获得的连续性被认为是人为的,是对多个控制性刺激-反应关系进行平均的结果。本文综述了检验这些多重关系对泛化梯度贡献的研究。几乎无一例外,量子解释似乎能更好地描述这些研究的结果。文中讨论了对峰值转移、分析水平的选择和行为单元的识别的影响,以及可能决定量子解释可接受性的因素。