Robinson J K, Woodward W R
Behav Anal. 1989 Fall;12(2):131-41. doi: 10.1007/BF03392490.
Behavioral biology and operant psychology have developed in parallel but separate paths since their origins in the 1930s. In the first three decades, both fields dealt with microscopic (or molecular) controlling variables and qualitative data. Since about 1960, both have primarily focused on macroscopic (or molar) controlling variables. Their shared interest in foraging in the 1980s suggests a limited convergence beween biologists and psychologists in data, methods, and theories. We draw on accounts of intertheoretic relations from the philosophy of science, including both interlevel theory and interfield theory, to understand this convergence. However, our greater emphasis on methods of data collection and analysis leads us to characterize the convergence as not only one of interfield theory but one of interfield science.
自20世纪30年代起源以来,行为生物学和操作性心理学沿着平行但独立的路径发展。在最初的三十年里,这两个领域都处理微观(或分子)控制变量和定性数据。自大约1960年以来,两者主要关注宏观(或整体)控制变量。它们在20世纪80年代对觅食的共同兴趣表明,生物学家和心理学家在数据、方法和理论上存在有限的趋同。我们借鉴科学哲学中关于理论间关系的论述,包括层际理论和跨领域理论,来理解这种趋同。然而,我们对数据收集和分析方法的更加强调使我们将这种趋同不仅描述为跨领域理论的趋同,而且是跨领域科学的趋同。