Suppr超能文献

中西部城市计划生育与社区健康诊所就诊女性的沙眼衣原体感染:危险因素、选择性筛查及非培养技术评估

Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women attending urban midwestern family planning and community health clinics: risk factors, selective screening, and evaluation of non-culture techniques.

作者信息

Addiss D G, Vaughn M L, Golubjatnikov R, Pfister J, Kurtycz D F, Davis J P

机构信息

Acute and Communicable Diseases Epidemiology Section, Wisconsin Division of Health, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, Madison 53701-0309.

出版信息

Sex Transm Dis. 1990 Jul-Sep;17(3):138-46. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199007000-00006.

Abstract

To determine prevalence and risk factors for endocervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in an urban midwestern population and to evaluate two non-culture direct tests for C. trachomatis, we studied 849 women attending two family planning clinics and a community health clinic in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Adequate endocervical specimens were obtained from 751 women for chlamydial isolation in tissue culture and antigen tests using direct fluorescence (DFA) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA); 93 (12.4%) patients had cultures positive for C. trachomatis. Compared to culture, the DFA test had a 77.4% sensitivity, 96.8% specificity, and a predictive value positive (PVP) of 77%. For the EIA, these values were 83.9%, 97.0%, and 80%, respectively. No single historical, clinical, or laboratory variable, including the previously described cervicitis index and specific cytologic findings on Pap smear, had sufficient predictive value to be used as the only criterion for selective screening in this population. Criteria for selective screening were proposed that would result in screening 43% of patients and would identify 71% of infections. PVP of both non-culture tests was 89% in persons identified by these criteria to be at increased risk of C. trachomatis infection.

摘要

为了确定美国中西部城市人群宫颈沙眼衣原体感染的患病率和危险因素,并评估两种沙眼衣原体非培养直接检测方法,我们对威斯康星州密尔沃基市两家计划生育诊所和一家社区健康诊所的849名女性进行了研究。从751名女性中获取了足够的宫颈标本,用于组织培养中的衣原体分离以及采用直接荧光法(DFA)和酶免疫法(EIA)的抗原检测;93名(12.4%)患者的沙眼衣原体培养呈阳性。与培养法相比,DFA检测的灵敏度为77.4%,特异性为96.8%,阳性预测值(PVP)为77%。对于EIA,这些值分别为83.9%、97.0%和80%。没有单一的病史、临床或实验室变量,包括先前描述的宫颈炎指数和巴氏涂片上的特定细胞学发现,具有足够的预测价值可作为该人群选择性筛查的唯一标准。提出了选择性筛查标准,这将导致对43%的患者进行筛查,并能识别71%的感染病例。在根据这些标准确定为沙眼衣原体感染风险增加的人群中,两种非培养检测方法的PVP均为89%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验