Perone M
Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;8(2):185-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03393150.
Reactions to published accounts of research with human subjects, as well as research with nonhuman subjects, were assessed by examining citations in several samples of empirical articles in the Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. A stable, asymmetrical pattern emerged: Nonhuman research was cited in both human and nonhuman articles, but human research was cited primarily in human articles. Thus, human operant research appears to have had little influence on the nonhuman research which constitutes the bulk of the experimental analysis of behavior. Interpretation of this lack of impact depends on the functions one envisions for human research, several of which are discussed.
通过检查《行为实验分析杂志》中几篇实证文章样本中的引用情况,评估了对已发表的关于人类受试者研究以及非人类受试者研究的报道的反应。一种稳定的、不对称的模式出现了:非人类研究在人类和非人类文章中都被引用,但人类研究主要在人类文章中被引用。因此,人类操作性研究似乎对构成行为实验分析主体的非人类研究影响甚微。对这种缺乏影响的解释取决于人们为人类研究设想的功能,本文将讨论其中的几种功能。