• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在人类层面分析强化过程:应用与行为主义解释能否取代实验室研究?

Analyzing the reinforcement process at the human level: can application and behavioristic interpretation replace laboratory research?

作者信息

Baron A, Perone M, Galizio M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

出版信息

Behav Anal. 1991 Fall;14(2):95-105. doi: 10.1007/BF03392557.

DOI:10.1007/BF03392557
PMID:22478086
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2733493/
Abstract

Critics have questioned the value of human operant conditioning experiments in the study of fundamental processes of reinforcement. Contradictory results from human and animal experiments have been attributed to the complex social and verbal history of the human subject. On these grounds, it has been contended that procedures that mimic those conventionally used with animal subjects represent a "poor analytic preparation" for the explication of reinforcement principles. In defending the use of conventional operant methods for human research, we make three points: (a) Historical variables play a critical role in research on processes of reinforcement, regardless of whether the subjects are humans or animals. (b) Techniques are available for detecting, analyzing, and counteracting such historical and extra-experimental influences; these include long-term observations, steady state designs, and, when variables are not amenable to direct control (e.g., age, gender, species), selection of subjects with common characteristics. (c) Other forms of evidence that might be used to validate conditioning principles-applied behavior analysis and behavioristic interpretation-have inherent limitations and cannot substitute for experimental analysis. We conclude that human operant conditioning experiments are essential for the analysis of the reinforcement process at the human level, but caution that their value depends on the extent to which the traditional methods of the experimental analysis of behavior are properly applied.

摘要

批评者们对人类操作性条件反射实验在强化基本过程研究中的价值提出了质疑。人类实验和动物实验得出的相互矛盾的结果,被归因于人类受试者复杂的社会和言语经历。基于这些理由,有人认为,模仿传统上用于动物受试者的程序,对于阐释强化原则而言是一种“糟糕的分析准备”。在为将传统操作性方法用于人类研究进行辩护时,我们提出三点:(a) 历史变量在强化过程研究中起着关键作用,无论受试者是人类还是动物。(b) 有技术可用于检测、分析和抵消此类历史及实验外影响;这些技术包括长期观察、稳态设计,以及当变量无法直接控制时(例如年龄、性别、物种),选择具有共同特征的受试者。(c) 可用于验证条件反射原则的其他形式的证据——应用行为分析和行为主义解释——存在固有局限性,无法替代实验分析。我们得出结论,人类操作性条件反射实验对于在人类层面分析强化过程至关重要,但要提醒的是,其价值取决于行为实验分析的传统方法得到恰当应用的程度。

相似文献

1
Analyzing the reinforcement process at the human level: can application and behavioristic interpretation replace laboratory research?在人类层面分析强化过程:应用与行为主义解释能否取代实验室研究?
Behav Anal. 1991 Fall;14(2):95-105. doi: 10.1007/BF03392557.
2
[Application of operant conditioning techniques to forensic toxicology: experimental studies on alcohol and abusable drugs].[操作性条件反射技术在法医毒理学中的应用:酒精和可滥用药物的实验研究]
Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi. 1996 Oct;50(5):292-319.
3
The dynamics of operant conditioning.操作性条件作用的动力学
Psychol Rev. 1999 Jan;106(1):20-61. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.106.1.20.
4
Behavioral Management Programs to Promote Laboratory Animal Welfare促进实验动物福利的行为管理计划
5
Operant sensation seeking in the mouse.小鼠的操作性感觉寻求行为
J Vis Exp. 2010 Nov 10(45):2292. doi: 10.3791/2292.
6
The place of the human subject in the operant laboratory.人类受试者在操作性实验室中的地位。
Behav Anal. 1982 Fall;5(2):143-58. doi: 10.1007/BF03392383.
7
Operant conditioning of enhanced pain sensitivity by heat-pain titration.通过热痛滴定对增强的疼痛敏感性进行操作性条件反射。
Pain. 2008 Nov 15;140(1):104-114. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.07.018. Epub 2008 Sep 5.
8
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
9
The basic-applied continuum and the possible evolution of human operant social and verbal research.基础应用连续体与人类操作性社会及言语研究的可能演变。
Behav Anal. 1982 Spring;5(1):21-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03393137.
10
The infant vocal-conditioning literature: a theoretical and methodological critique.
J Exp Child Psychol. 1988 Dec;46(3):438-50. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(88)90071-9.

引用本文的文献

1
ABA from A to Z: Behavior Science Applied to 350 Domains of Socially Significant Behavior.《从A到Z的应用行为分析:行为科学应用于350个具有社会重要性的行为领域》
Perspect Behav Sci. 2022 May 17;45(2):327-359. doi: 10.1007/s40614-022-00336-z. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Evaluating Extinction, Renewal, and Resurgence of Operant Behavior in Humans with Amazon Mechanical Turk.利用亚马逊土耳其机器人平台评估人类操作性行为的消退、恢复和复发。
Learn Motiv. 2021 May;74. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2021.101728. Epub 2021 May 13.
3
Abstraction, Multiple Exemplar Training and the Search for Derived Stimulus Relations in Animals.抽象、多重范例训练与动物对派生刺激关系的探索。
Perspect Behav Sci. 2017 Nov 1;41(1):45-67. doi: 10.1007/s40614-017-0112-y. eCollection 2018 Jun.
4
The Fuzzy Concept of Applied Behavior Analysis Research.应用行为分析研究的模糊概念
Behav Anal. 2017 May 15;40(1):123-159. doi: 10.1007/s40614-017-0093-x. eCollection 2017 Jun.
5
An Emotional Appeal for the Development of Empirical Research on Narrative.对叙事实证研究发展的情感呼吁。
Perspect Behav Sci. 2018 Aug 27;41(2):575-590. doi: 10.1007/s40614-018-0170-9. eCollection 2018 Nov.
6
A Historical Perspective on the Future of Behavior Science.行为科学未来的历史视角
Behav Anal. 2015 May 12;38(2):149-61. doi: 10.1007/s40614-015-0030-9. eCollection 2015 Oct.
7
Effects of Mands on Instructional Control: A Laboratory Simulation.指令对教学控制的影响:一项实验室模拟研究
Anal Verbal Behav. 2014 Jun 7;30(2):100-12. doi: 10.1007/s40616-014-0015-x. eCollection 2014 Oct.
8
Commentary "A Crisis in Comparative Psychology: Where have all the Undergraduates Gone?" Collaborating with Behavior Analysts Could Avert a Crisis in Comparative Psychology.评论《比较心理学的危机:本科生都去哪儿了?》与行为分析师合作可避免比较心理学的危机。
Front Psychol. 2015 Nov 13;6:1743. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01743. eCollection 2015.
9
Effects of differential reinforcement and rules with feedback on preference for choice and verbal reports.差别强化及带反馈规则对选择偏好和言语报告的影响。
Anal Verbal Behav. 2012;28(1):31-57. doi: 10.1007/BF03393106.
10
What 50 years of research tell us about pausing under ratio schedules of reinforcement.50年的研究告诉了我们关于在强化比率时间表下停顿的哪些信息。
Behav Anal. 2008 Spring;31(1):39-60. doi: 10.1007/BF03392160.

本文引用的文献

1
On the impact of human operant research: Asymmetrical patterns of cross-citation between human and nonhuman research.论人类操作性研究的影响:人类与非人类研究之间交叉引用的不对称模式。
Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;8(2):185-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03393150.
2
Comparing humans to other species: We're animals and they're not infrahumans.将人类与其他物种进行比较:我们是动物,而它们不是低于人类的动物。
Behav Anal. 1984 Fall;7(2):211-2. doi: 10.1007/BF03391905.
3
A citation analysis of the influence on research of Skinner's verbal behavior.对斯金纳言语行为研究影响力的文献计量分析
Behav Anal. 1984 Fall;7(2):157-67. doi: 10.1007/BF03391898.
4
Las Vegas knows better.拉斯维加斯更清楚。
Behav Anal. 1983 Spring;6(1):109-10. doi: 10.1007/BF03391879.
5
Two correct definitions of "Applied".“Applied”的两种正确定义。
Behav Anal. 1983 Spring;6(1):105-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03391877.
6
Applied behavior analysis: New directions from the laboratory.应用行为分析:来自实验室的新方向。
Behav Anal. 1983 Spring;6(1):27-37. doi: 10.1007/BF03391871.
7
The place of the human subject in the operant laboratory.人类受试者在操作性实验室中的地位。
Behav Anal. 1982 Fall;5(2):143-58. doi: 10.1007/BF03392383.
8
The fixed-interval scallop in human affairs.人类事务中的固定间隔扇贝效应。
Behav Anal. 1982 Fall;5(2):127-36. doi: 10.1007/BF03392381.
9
Defining applied behavior analysis: an historical analogy.界定应用行为分析:一个历史类比。
Behav Anal. 1982 Spring;5(1):53-64. doi: 10.1007/BF03393140.
10
The basic-applied continuum and the possible evolution of human operant social and verbal research.基础应用连续体与人类操作性社会及言语研究的可能演变。
Behav Anal. 1982 Spring;5(1):21-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03393137.