Schmitt D R
Behav Anal. 1986 Spring;9(1):27-34. doi: 10.1007/BF03391927.
Conclusions drawn from research in the social sciences comparing the quality or quantity of performance under cooperation and competiton stress the advantages of cooperation. This generalization may be premature, however, because of the paucity of experimental analyses investigating variations in competitive conditions. Neglected in particular have been variables that affect reinforcement conditions among competitors. These include performance differences, the basis of reinforcement, reinforcer distribution, and stimuli that indicate the performances of other competitors. These variables provide the basis for a behavioral interpretation of performance under competition. The result is a clearer understanding of the options that are available in instituting competitive contingencies and the areas in which experimental analyses are needed.
社会科学研究通过比较合作与竞争压力下的表现质量或数量得出的结论强调了合作的优势。然而,由于缺乏对竞争条件变化进行调查的实验分析,这一概括可能为时过早。尤其被忽视的是那些影响竞争者之间强化条件的变量。这些变量包括表现差异、强化的基础、强化物分配以及表明其他竞争者表现的刺激因素。这些变量为竞争环境下的表现提供了行为学解释的基础。其结果是更清楚地理解在制定竞争意外情况时可用的选项以及需要进行实验分析的领域。