Navarro Suay Ricardo, Abadía de Barbará Alberto Hernández, Gutierrez Ortega Carlos, Bartolomé Cela Enrique, Lam David M, Gilsanz Rodríguez Fernando
Grupo de Escuelas de la Defensa, Escuela Militar de Sanidad, Camino de los Ingenieros n 6, CP: 28071 Madrid, Spain.
Mil Med. 2012 Mar;177(3):326-32. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-11-00395.
To provide an analysis of casualties treated during medical evacuation (MEDEVAC) or/and at the Spanish Role 2 in Herat, Afghanistan, including type of weapon, injuries, and effects of protective measures.
A retrospective analysis was carried out concerning patients who had suffered injuries from either gunshot or explosive devices treated during MEDEVAC or/and at this facility during the period 2005-2008.
The total number of cases analyzed was 256. The majority of the casualties were produced by explosive devices (71%). The anatomical regions most affected were the lower limbs (48%). There was a higher New Injury Severity Score in casualties wounded by gunshot (14 +/- 1) than in those wounded by explosive devices (8.5 +/- 1.5) (p < 0.001). Surgical procedures for injuries caused by gunshots were 1.7 times more likely than for those due to explosive devices (95% confidence interval: 1.4 to 2.1). Protective devices were used only by 25% of casualties.
The injury score indices of firearm casualties were higher than the explosive device casualties' injury score indices. The possible reasons for this finding are discussed.
分析在阿富汗赫拉特的医疗后送(MEDEVAC)过程中或/及西班牙二级医疗设施中治疗的伤员情况,包括武器类型、损伤情况及防护措施的效果。
对2005年至2008年期间在MEDEVAC过程中或/及该设施接受治疗的因枪伤或爆炸装置受伤的患者进行回顾性分析。
分析的病例总数为256例。大多数伤员是由爆炸装置造成的(71%)。受影响最严重的解剖部位是下肢(48%)。枪伤伤员的新损伤严重程度评分(14±1)高于爆炸装置伤伤员(8.5±1.5)(p<0.001)。枪伤所致损伤的外科手术发生率比爆炸装置伤所致损伤高1.7倍(95%置信区间:1.4至2.1)。只有25%的伤员使用了防护装置。
枪伤伤员的损伤评分指数高于爆炸装置伤伤员的损伤评分指数。讨论了这一发现的可能原因。