Suppr超能文献

现代武装冲突中爆炸装置的影响:对阿富汗南部荷兰战斗伤亡情况的深入分析

Impact of explosive devices in modern armed conflicts: in-depth analysis of Dutch battle casualties in southern Afghanistan.

作者信息

Hoencamp Rigo, Huizinga Eelco P, van Dongen Thijs T C F, Idenburg Floris J, Ramasamy Arul, Leenen Luke P H, Hamming Jaap F

机构信息

Department of Surgery, K6-50, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands,

出版信息

World J Surg. 2014 Oct;38(10):2551-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2645-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The patterns and mechanisms of injuries of all Dutch battle casualties (BCs) were analyzed to improve the care for injured service members. We performed an in-depth analysis of all Dutch BCs during the participation of The Netherlands as lead nation in the International Security Assistance Force mission in southern Afghanistan.

METHODS

Participants were selected from the trauma registry at the Dutch Role 2 Medical Treatment Facility if they met the criteria for Dutch BC between August 2006 and August 2010.

RESULTS

The trauma registry query resulted in 199 Dutch BCs. The battle injuries were predominantly caused by explosions (83.9 %). The case-fatality rate was 9.5 %: 16.5 % were killed in action, and 1.1 % died of wounds. The wounding pattern was as follows: head and neck (32.2 %), thorax (7.8 %), abdomen (12.7 %), upper extremity (17.6 %), lower extremity (29.7 %). The mean Abbreviated Injury Scale and Injury Severity Score were 3 (range 0-5) and 11 (range 1-43), respectively in the wounded-in-action group.

CONCLUSIONS

Explosive devices accounted for almost 85 % of the casualties-much higher than in previous wars. Knowledge of the management of these injuries is also valuable in treating casualties from natural disasters or (terrorist) mass casualty situations. An integral multinational joint approach is highly recommended to develop more effective protective equipment and body armor. Prospective registration in a standardized system of data collection that encompasses all echelons of the medical support organization should be implemented.

摘要

背景

对所有荷兰战斗伤员(BCs)的损伤模式和机制进行分析,以改善对受伤军人的护理。在荷兰作为主导国家参与阿富汗南部国际安全援助部队任务期间,我们对所有荷兰战斗伤员进行了深入分析。

方法

如果参与者符合2006年8月至2010年8月期间荷兰战斗伤员的标准,则从荷兰二级医疗救治机构的创伤登记处选取。

结果

创伤登记查询得到199名荷兰战斗伤员。战斗损伤主要由爆炸造成(83.9%)。病死率为9.5%:16.5%在行动中死亡,1.1%因伤死亡。受伤模式如下:头部和颈部(32.2%)、胸部(7.8%)、腹部(12.7%)、上肢(17.6%)、下肢(29.7%)。行动中受伤组的平均简明损伤定级和损伤严重度评分分别为3(范围0 - 5)和11(范围1 - 43)。

结论

爆炸装置造成了近85%的伤亡——远高于以往战争。了解这些损伤的处理方法对于治疗自然灾害或(恐怖主义)大规模伤亡事件中的伤员也很有价值。强烈建议采取综合的多国联合方法来开发更有效的防护装备和防弹衣。应在涵盖医疗支持组织所有层级的标准化数据收集系统中进行前瞻性登记。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验