Arregui Lucía, Liébana Raquel, Rodríguez Eva, Murciano Antonio, Conejero Francisco, Pérez-Uz Blanca, Serrano Susana
Dept Microbiología III, Facultad de CC. Biológicas, Universidad Complutense, C/José Antonio Novais 12, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
J Environ Monit. 2012 May;14(5):1444-52. doi: 10.1039/c2em10861e. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
The quality of the sludge in Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs) depends on the suitable colonization of the flocs by microorganisms. Due to the functional importance of these biological constituents, several biological or biological-related parameters have been commonly used for the control of depuration efficiency. According to national and international water regulation recommendations, interlaboratory studies have a great relevance to determine which parameters are more reliable for their extensive application in routine control. However, these studies are also very useful to demonstrate consistency in results from multiple laboratories and to develop reliable and reproducible methodologies which might be necessary for protocol validation and also for accreditation issues to meet regulatory environmental requirements. The main purpose of this work was to assess the results obtained in consecutive interlaboratory assays in order to determine the concordance degree in the application of biological parameters by participating laboratories. Following the international recommendations about these studies, a common working protocol was proposed. Statistical tests indicated that Sludge Index and several routine physical-chemical analyses [V30, Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids (MLSS), Mixed Liquor Volatile Solids (MLVS) and Sludge Volumetric Index (SVI)] show low variability and therefore are suitable tools for laboratory control. Shannon Index and Sludge Biotic Index also presented low variability although a more precise protocol would be necessary, in particular the methodology to count small flagellates. The abundance and identification of protist species showed low concordance among laboratories and three factors were responsible for the low reliability of data: population density, size and morphological distinguishable characters of the specimens.
污水处理厂(WWTPs)中污泥的质量取决于微生物对絮体的适宜定殖。由于这些生物成分的功能重要性,一些生物或与生物相关的参数已被普遍用于控制净化效率。根据国家和国际水法规建议,实验室间研究对于确定哪些参数在常规控制中更广泛应用时更可靠具有重要意义。然而,这些研究对于证明多个实验室结果的一致性以及开发可靠且可重复的方法也非常有用,这些方法对于方案验证以及满足监管环境要求的认证问题可能是必要的。这项工作的主要目的是评估在连续的实验室间分析中获得的结果,以确定参与实验室在应用生物参数方面的一致程度。遵循关于这些研究的国际建议,提出了一个通用的工作方案。统计测试表明,污泥指数和一些常规物理化学分析[V30、混合液悬浮固体(MLSS)、混合液挥发性固体(MLVS)和污泥体积指数(SVI)]显示出低变异性,因此是实验室控制的合适工具。香农指数和污泥生物指数也呈现出低变异性,尽管需要更精确的方案,特别是对小型鞭毛虫进行计数的方法。原生生物物种的丰度和鉴定在各实验室之间显示出低一致性,并且有三个因素导致数据的可靠性较低:标本的种群密度、大小和形态可区分特征。