Suppr超能文献

负荷分担分类是否能预测胸腰椎爆裂骨折患者的韧带损伤、神经损伤和手术需求?:临床文章。

Does the load-sharing classification predict ligamentous injury, neurological injury, and the need for surgery in patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures?: Clinical article.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Jun;16(6):534-8. doi: 10.3171/2012.3.SPINE11570. Epub 2012 Apr 6.

Abstract

OBJECT

The load-sharing score (LSS) of vertebral body comminution is predictive of results after short-segment posterior instrumentation of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Some authors have posited that an LSS > 6 is predictive of neurological injury, ligamentous injury, and the need for surgical intervention. However, the authors of the present study hypothesized that the LSS does not predict ligamentous or neurological injury.

METHODS

The prospectively collected spinal cord injury database from a single institution was queried for thoracolumbar burst fractures. Study inclusion criteria were acute (< 24 hours) burst fractures between T-10 and L-2 with preoperative CT and MRI. Flexion-distraction injuries and pathological fractures were excluded. Four experienced spine surgeons determined the LSS and posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) integrity. Neurological status was assessed from a review of the medical records.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were included in the study. There were 4 patients for whom all observers assigned an LSS > 6, recommending operative treatment. Eleven patients had LSSs ≤ 6 across all observers, suggesting that nonoperative treatment would be appropriate. There was moderate interobserver agreement (0.43) for the overall LSS and fair agreement (0.24) for an LSS > 6. Correlations between the LSS and the PLC score averaged 0.18 across all observers (range -0.02 to 0.34, p value range 0.02-0.89). Correlations between the LSS and the American Spinal Injury Association motor score averaged -0.12 across all observers (range -0.25 to -0.03, p value range 0.1-0.87). Correlations describing the relationship between an LSS > 6 and the treating physician's decision to operate averaged 0.17 across all observers (range 0.11-0.24, p value range 0.12-0.47).

CONCLUSIONS

The LSS does not uniformly correlate with the PLC injury, neurological status, or empirical clinical decision making. The LSSs of only one observer correlated significantly with PLC injury. There were no significant correlations between the LSS as determined by any observer and neurological status or clinical decision making.

摘要

目的

椎体粉碎的载荷分担评分(LSS)可预测短节段后路器械固定胸腰椎爆裂骨折的结果。一些作者提出,LSS>6 可预测神经损伤、韧带损伤和手术干预的需要。然而,本研究的作者假设 LSS 不能预测韧带或神经损伤。

方法

对单机构前瞻性收集的脊髓损伤数据库进行胸腰椎爆裂骨折查询。研究纳入标准为 T-10 与 L-2 之间急性(<24 小时)爆裂骨折,术前 CT 和 MRI 检查。排除屈伸分离损伤和病理性骨折。四位经验丰富的脊柱外科医生确定 LSS 和后纵韧带复合体(PLC)完整性。通过审查病历评估神经状态。

结果

44 例患者纳入研究。有 4 例患者所有观察者均评定 LSS>6,建议手术治疗。11 例患者所有观察者的 LSSs≤6,表明非手术治疗是合适的。整体 LSS 观察者间的一致性中等(0.43),LSS>6 的一致性为差(0.24)。所有观察者的 LSS 与 PLC 评分的相关性平均为 0.18(范围为-0.02 至 0.34,p 值范围为 0.02-0.89)。所有观察者的 LSS 与美国脊髓损伤协会运动评分的相关性平均为-0.12(范围为-0.25 至-0.03,p 值范围为 0.1-0.87)。描述 LSS>6 与治疗医生手术决策关系的相关性,所有观察者的平均相关性为 0.17(范围为 0.11-0.24,p 值范围为 0.12-0.47)。

结论

LSS 与 PLC 损伤、神经状态或经验性临床决策不一致地相关。仅一位观察者的 LSSs 与 PLC 损伤显著相关。任何观察者确定的 LSS 与神经状态或临床决策均无显著相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验