Kilgore W W
Department of Environmental Toxicology, University of California-Davis 95616.
Am J Ind Med. 1990;18(4):491-4. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700180422.
In 1986, the voters of California passed a law regarding the concept of extrapolating animal toxicity data to humans. The California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, known as Proposition 65, does five things: 1. It creates a list of chemicals (including a number of agricultural chemicals) known to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity; 2. It limits discharges of listed chemicals to drinking water sources; 3. It requires prior warning before exposure to listed chemicals by anyone in the course of doing business; 4. It creates a list of chemicals requiring testing for carcinogenicity or reproductive toxicity; and 5. It requires the Governor to consult with qualified experts (a 12-member "Scientific Advisory Panel" was appointed) as necessary to carry out his duties. This paper discusses the details and implications of this proposition. Areas of responsibility have been assigned. The definition of significant risk is being addressed.
1986年,加利福尼亚州的选民通过了一项关于将动物毒性数据外推至人类的概念的法律。1986年的《加利福尼亚安全饮用水和有毒物质执法法案》,即第65号提案,有以下五项举措:1. 它创建了一份已知会导致癌症或生殖毒性的化学物质清单(包括多种农用化学品);2. 它限制向饮用水源排放列入清单的化学物质;3. 它要求任何在经营过程中接触列入清单的化学物质的人在接触前得到事先警告;4. 它创建了一份需要进行致癌性或生殖毒性测试的化学物质清单;5. 它要求州长在履行职责时必要时咨询合格专家(已任命一个由12名成员组成的“科学咨询小组”)。本文讨论了该提案的细节和影响。已明确了职责范围。正在探讨重大风险的定义。