Sugawara Y, Tamura S, Yamashiki N, Kaneko J, Aoki T, Sakamoto Y, Hasegawa K, Kokudo N
Artificial Organ and Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Transplant Proc. 2012 Apr;44(3):791-3. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.01.031.
Recurrence following liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV), which is universal, affects long-term outcomes. Treatment with interferon (IFN) and ribavirin (RBV), the only widely available options at this time, have been faced with low tolerability and overall unsatisfactory results in deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). However, its place after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains a matter of debate. Since most LDLT cases are performed in a planned manner at a lower Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score compared to DDLT, we have aggressively applied preemptive INF/RBV in our series.
We studied 122 adult recipients who underwent LDLT for HCV-related end-stage liver disease. The preemptive IFN/RBV protocol initiated treatment promptly after improvement in the patient's general condition with a low-dose IFN alpha2b and RBV (400 mg/d) followed by a gradual increase in the INFalpha2b dosage. Finally, we applied pegylated IFN (1.5 ug/kg/wk) and RBV (800 mg/d). The treatment was continued for 12 months after serum HCV-RNA became negative, which was defined as the end-of-treatment response (ETR). The response was considered to be a sustained viral response (SVR) if there were negative serologic results without antiviral treatment for another 6 months. Splenectomy was performed at the time of LDLT to improve tolerability to INF/RBV. The median age of the patients was 55 yrs (range = 23-66), with male dominance (87 males and 35 females). Median MELD score was 14 (range = 6-48). The series included 72 patients with hepatocellular carcinomas, and six with HIV coinfections. In 98 cases, HCV genotype was 1b.
Overall survival at 5 years was 79%. Cumulative response rates under the protocol were ETR 56% and SVR 44% at 5 years.
Preemptive IFN/RBV therapy after LDLT for HCV is feasible with acceptable outcomes.
丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)肝移植后的复发是普遍现象,影响长期预后。目前唯一广泛可用的干扰素(IFN)和利巴韦林(RBV)治疗,在尸体供肝肝移植(DDLT)中耐受性低且总体结果不尽人意。然而,其在活体供肝肝移植(LDLT)后的地位仍存在争议。由于与DDLT相比,大多数LDLT病例是以计划方式在较低的终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分下进行的,我们在我们的系列研究中积极应用了预防性IFN/RBV。
我们研究了122例因HCV相关终末期肝病接受LDLT的成年受者。预防性IFN/RBV方案在患者一般状况改善后立即开始治疗,使用低剂量的IFNα2b和RBV(400mg/d),随后逐渐增加IFNα2b剂量。最后,我们应用聚乙二醇化IFN(1.5μg/kg/周)和RBV(800mg/d)。血清HCV-RNA转阴后治疗持续12个月,这被定义为治疗结束反应(ETR)。如果在未进行抗病毒治疗的情况下,血清学结果在另外6个月内仍为阴性,则该反应被认为是持续病毒学应答(SVR)。在LDLT时进行脾切除术以提高对IFN/RBV的耐受性。患者的中位年龄为55岁(范围=23-66岁),男性占主导(87例男性和35例女性)。中位MELD评分为14(范围=6-48)。该系列包括72例肝细胞癌患者和6例合并HIV感染的患者。98例患者的HCV基因型为1b。
5年总生存率为79%。该方案下的累积反应率在5年时ETR为56%,SVR为44%。
LDLT后预防性IFN/RBV治疗对HCV是可行的,结果可接受。