• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尿嘧啶-DNA 糖基化酶 UNG2 和 SMUG1 具有显著不同的性质,这可能解释了它们在基因组中尿嘧啶处理方面的不同作用。

Strikingly different properties of uracil-DNA glycosylases UNG2 and SMUG1 may explain divergent roles in processing of genomic uracil.

机构信息

Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

DNA Repair (Amst). 2012 Jun 1;11(6):587-93. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.dnarep.2012.03.003
PMID:22483865
Abstract

Genomic uracil resulting from spontaneously deaminated cytosine generates mutagenic U:G mismatches that are usually corrected by error-free base excision repair (BER). However, in B-cells, activation-induced cytosine deaminase (AID) generates U:G mismatches in hot-spot sequences at Ig loci. These are subject to mutagenic processing during somatic hypermutation (SHM) and class switch recombination (CSR). Uracil N-glycosylases UNG2 and SMUG1 (single strand-selective monofunctional uracil-DNA glycosylase 1) initiate error-free BER in most DNA contexts, but UNG2 is also involved in mutagenic processing of AID-induced uracil during the antibody diversification process, the regulation of which is not understood. AID is strictly single strand-specific. Here we show that in the presence of Mg2+ and monovalent salts, human and mouse SMUG1 are essentially double strand-specific, whereas UNG2 efficiently removes uracil from both single and double stranded DNA under all tested conditions. Furthermore, SMUG1 and UNG2 display widely different sequence preferences. Interestingly, uracil in a hot-spot sequence for AID is 200-fold more efficiently removed from single stranded DNA by UNG2 than by SMUG1. This may explain why SMUG1, which is not excluded from Ig loci, is unable to replace UNG2 in antibody diversification. We suggest a model for mutagenic processing in which replication protein A (RPA) recruits UNG2 to sites of deamination and keeps DNA in a single stranded conformation, thus avoiding error-free BER of the deaminated cytosine.

摘要

自发脱氨的胞嘧啶产生的基因组尿嘧啶会产生诱变的 U:G 错配,这些错配通常可以通过无差错碱基切除修复 (BER) 来修复。然而,在 B 细胞中,激活诱导的胞嘧啶脱氨酶 (AID) 在 Ig 基因座的热点序列中产生 U:G 错配。这些在体细胞高频突变 (SHM) 和类别转换重组 (CSR) 过程中会发生诱变处理。UNG2 和 SMUG1(单链选择性单功能尿嘧啶-DNA 糖基化酶 1)在大多数 DNA 环境中启动无差错的 BER,但 UNG2 也参与 AID 诱导的尿嘧啶在抗体多样化过程中的诱变处理,其调控机制尚不清楚。AID 严格具有单链特异性。本文研究表明,在 Mg2+和单价盐存在的情况下,人和鼠的 SMUG1 本质上是双链特异性的,而 UNG2 在所有测试条件下均能有效从单链和双链 DNA 中去除尿嘧啶。此外,SMUG1 和 UNG2 显示出广泛不同的序列偏好。有趣的是,在 AID 的热点序列中,尿嘧啶从单链 DNA 中被 UNG2 去除的效率比 SMUG1 高 200 倍。这可能解释了为什么不能从 Ig 基因座中排除的 SMUG1 无法在抗体多样化中替代 UNG2。本文提出了一种诱变处理模型,其中复制蛋白 A (RPA) 将 UNG2 招募到脱氨位点,并使 DNA 保持单链构象,从而避免脱氨胞嘧啶的无差错 BER。

相似文献

1
Strikingly different properties of uracil-DNA glycosylases UNG2 and SMUG1 may explain divergent roles in processing of genomic uracil.尿嘧啶-DNA 糖基化酶 UNG2 和 SMUG1 具有显著不同的性质,这可能解释了它们在基因组中尿嘧啶处理方面的不同作用。
DNA Repair (Amst). 2012 Jun 1;11(6):587-93. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
2
Uracil-DNA glycosylases SMUG1 and UNG2 coordinate the initial steps of base excision repair by distinct mechanisms.尿嘧啶-DNA糖基化酶SMUG1和UNG2通过不同机制协调碱基切除修复的起始步骤。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(12):3879-92. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm372. Epub 2007 May 30.
3
Repair of U/G and U/A in DNA by UNG2-associated repair complexes takes place predominantly by short-patch repair both in proliferating and growth-arrested cells.UNG2相关修复复合物对DNA中尿嘧啶/鸟嘌呤(U/G)和尿嘧啶/腺嘌呤(U/A)的修复在增殖细胞和生长停滞细胞中主要通过短补丁修复进行。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Oct 12;32(18):5486-98. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh872. Print 2004.
4
Uracil in DNA--general mutagen, but normal intermediate in acquired immunity.DNA中的尿嘧啶——一般诱变剂,但在获得性免疫中是正常中间体。
DNA Repair (Amst). 2007 Apr 1;6(4):505-16. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.10.014. Epub 2006 Nov 20.
5
Error-free versus mutagenic processing of genomic uracil--relevance to cancer.基因组尿嘧啶的无差错与诱变处理——与癌症的相关性
DNA Repair (Amst). 2014 Jul;19:38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.03.028. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
6
B cells from hyper-IgM patients carrying UNG mutations lack ability to remove uracil from ssDNA and have elevated genomic uracil.携带UNG突变的高IgM患者的B细胞缺乏从单链DNA中去除尿嘧啶的能力,并且基因组尿嘧啶水平升高。
J Exp Med. 2005 Jun 20;201(12):2011-21. doi: 10.1084/jem.20050042.
7
Different organization of base excision repair of uracil in DNA in nuclei and mitochondria and selective upregulation of mitochondrial uracil-DNA glycosylase after oxidative stress.细胞核和线粒体中DNA尿嘧啶碱基切除修复的不同组织方式以及氧化应激后线粒体尿嘧啶-DNA糖基化酶的选择性上调。
Neuroscience. 2007 Apr 14;145(4):1201-12. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.10.010. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
8
The UNG2 Arg88Cys variant abrogates RPA-mediated recruitment of UNG2 to single-stranded DNA.UNG2 Arg88Cys 变异体使 UNG2 无法募集到单链 DNA 上的 RPA。
DNA Repair (Amst). 2012 Jun 1;11(6):559-69. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
9
Genomic uracil and human disease.基因组尿嘧啶与人类疾病。
Exp Cell Res. 2006 Aug 15;312(14):2666-72. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.06.015. Epub 2006 Jun 21.
10
The rate of base excision repair of uracil is controlled by the initiating glycosylase.尿嘧啶的碱基切除修复速率由起始糖基化酶控制。
DNA Repair (Amst). 2008 Nov 1;7(11):1869-81. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.07.012. Epub 2008 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Ion-DNA Interactions as a Key Determinant of Uracil DNA Glycosylase Activity.离子与DNA的相互作用是尿嘧啶DNA糖基化酶活性的关键决定因素。
Biochemistry. 2025 May 20;64(10):2332-2344. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5c00067. Epub 2025 May 7.
2
Small-molecule activator of SMUG1 enhances repair of pyrimidine lesions in DNA.SMUG1的小分子激活剂可增强DNA中嘧啶损伤的修复。
DNA Repair (Amst). 2025 Feb;146:103809. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2025.103809. Epub 2025 Jan 14.
3
A Knockout of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase 1 in a Human Cell Line: An Influence on Base Excision Repair Reactions in Cellular Extracts.
一个人源细胞系中聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶 1 的敲除:对细胞抽提物中碱基切除修复反应的影响。
Cells. 2024 Feb 6;13(4):302. doi: 10.3390/cells13040302.
4
RPA guides UNG to uracil in ssDNA to facilitate antibody class switching and repair of mutagenic uracil at the replication fork.RPA 引导 UNG 至 ssDNA 中的尿嘧啶,以促进抗体类别转换,并在复制叉处修复诱变的尿嘧啶。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 Jan 25;52(2):784-800. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad1115.
5
Ionic strength modulates excision of uracil by SMUG1 from nucleosome core particles.离子强度调节 SMUG1 从核小体核心颗粒中切除尿嘧啶。
DNA Repair (Amst). 2023 May;125:103482. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2023.103482. Epub 2023 Mar 12.
6
dCas9 binding inhibits the initiation of base excision repair in vitro.dCas9 结合抑制体外碱基切除修复的起始。
DNA Repair (Amst). 2022 Jan;109:103257. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2021.103257. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
7
RPA2 winged-helix domain facilitates UNG-mediated removal of uracil from ssDNA; implications for repair of mutagenic uracil at the replication fork.RPA2 翼状螺旋结构域促进 UNG 介导的 ssDNA 中尿嘧啶的去除;对复制叉处诱变尿嘧啶修复的影响。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Apr 19;49(7):3948-3966. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab195.
8
The Multiple Cellular Roles of SMUG1 in Genome Maintenance and Cancer.SMUG1 在基因组维护和癌症中的多种细胞作用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Feb 17;22(4):1981. doi: 10.3390/ijms22041981.
9
The N-terminal domain of uracil-DNA glycosylase: Roles for disordered regions.尿嘧啶-DNA 糖基化酶的 N 端结构域:无规卷曲区域的作用。
DNA Repair (Amst). 2021 May;101:103077. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2021.103077. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
10
Nucleosomes and the three glycosylases: High, medium, and low levels of excision by the uracil DNA glycosylase superfamily.核小体和三种糖苷酶:尿嘧啶 DNA 糖基化酶超家族的高、中、低水平切除。
DNA Repair (Amst). 2018 Dec;72:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Sep 20.