• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较效 用研究在输血医学临床试验中的作用:国家心、肺、血液研究所研讨会的报告。

The role of comparative effectiveness research in transfusion medicine clinical trials: proceedings of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop.

机构信息

McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2012 Jun;52(6):1363-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03640.x. Epub 2012 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03640.x
PMID:22486525
Abstract

Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is the study of existing treatments or ways to deliver health care to determine what intervention works best under specific circumstances. CER evaluates evidence from existing studies or generates new evidence, in different populations and under specific conditions in which the treatments are actually used. CER does not embrace one research design over another but compares treatments and variations in practice using methods that are most likely to yield widely generalizable results that are directly relevant to clinical practice. Treatments used in transfusion medicine (TM) are among the most widely used in clinical practice, but are among the least well studied. High-quality evidence is lacking for most transfusion practices, with research efforts hampered by regulatory restrictions and ethical barriers. To begin addressing these issues, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute convened a workshop in June 2011 to address the potential role of CER in the generation of high-quality evidence for TM decision making. Workshop goals were to: 1) evaluate the current landscape of clinical research, 2) review the potential application of CER methods to clinical research, 3) assess potential barriers to the use of CER methodology, 4) determine whether pilot or vanguard studies can be used to facilitate planning of future CER research, and 5) consider the need for and delivery of training in CER methods for researchers.

摘要

比较疗效研究(CER)是对现有治疗方法或医疗保健提供方式的研究,以确定在特定情况下哪种干预措施效果最佳。CER 评估来自现有研究的证据或生成新的证据,这些证据涉及不同人群和特定条件下实际使用的治疗方法。CER 不偏向于某种研究设计,而是使用最有可能产生广泛普遍适用且直接与临床实践相关的结果的方法来比较治疗方法和实践中的差异。输血医学(TM)中使用的治疗方法是临床实践中最广泛使用的治疗方法之一,但也是研究最少的治疗方法之一。大多数输血实践缺乏高质量的证据,由于监管限制和伦理障碍,研究工作受到阻碍。为了解决这些问题,美国国立心肺血液研究所于 2011 年 6 月召开了一次研讨会,探讨 CER 在生成 TM 决策的高质量证据方面的潜在作用。研讨会的目标是:1)评估当前临床研究的现状;2)审查 CER 方法在临床研究中的潜在应用;3)评估使用 CER 方法的潜在障碍;4)确定是否可以进行试点或先锋研究,以促进未来 CER 研究的规划;5)考虑为研究人员提供 CER 方法培训的必要性和培训方法。

相似文献

1
The role of comparative effectiveness research in transfusion medicine clinical trials: proceedings of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop.比较效 用研究在输血医学临床试验中的作用:国家心、肺、血液研究所研讨会的报告。
Transfusion. 2012 Jun;52(6):1363-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03640.x. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
2
Scientific and organizational collaboration in comparative effectiveness research: the VA cooperative studies program model.科学和组织协作在比较效果研究中:VA 合作研究计划模式。
Am J Med. 2010 Dec;123(12 Suppl 1):e24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.10.005.
3
Defining comparative effectiveness research: the importance of getting it right.定义比较效果研究:正确定义的重要性。
Med Care. 2010 Jun;48(6 Suppl):S7-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181da3709.
4
The past, present, and future of comparative effectiveness research in the US Department of Veterans Affairs.美国退伍军人事务部比较效果研究的过去、现在和未来。
Am J Med. 2010 Dec;123(12 Suppl 1):e3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.10.002.
5
Perioperative comparative effectiveness research.围手术期比较效果研究。
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Dec;25(4):535-47. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2011.08.004.
6
Comparative effectiveness research: welcome to the real world.比较效果研究:欢迎来到现实世界。
Transfusion. 2012 Jun;52(6):1162-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03692.x.
7
Clinical trial opportunities in Transfusion Medicine: proceedings of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute State-of-the-Science Symposium.输血医学临床试验机会:美国国立心肺血液研究所科学研讨会论文集。
Transfus Med Rev. 2010 Oct;24(4):259-85. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2010.05.002.
8
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
9
Overview of best practices in conducting comparative-effectiveness reviews.开展药物经济学评价的最佳实践概述。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Dec;90(6):876-82. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.239. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
10
Clinical research on traditional drugs and food items--the potential of comparative effectiveness research for interdisciplinary research.传统药物和食品的临床研究——比较有效性研究为跨学科研究带来的潜力。
J Ethnopharmacol. 2013 May 2;147(1):254-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2013.02.024. Epub 2013 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
2016 proceedings of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's scientific priorities in pediatric transfusion medicine.2016年美国国立心肺血液研究所儿科输血医学科学优先事项会议记录
Transfusion. 2017 Jun;57(6):1568-1581. doi: 10.1111/trf.14100. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
2
Transfusion of recently donated (fresh) red blood cells (RBCs) does not improve survival in comparison with current practice, while safety of the oldest stored units is yet to be established: a meta-analysis.与当前做法相比,输注近期捐献的(新鲜)红细胞并不能提高生存率,而最陈旧储存单位的安全性尚待确定:一项荟萃分析。
Vox Sang. 2016 Jul;111(1):43-54. doi: 10.1111/vox.12380. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
3
Clinical trials in crisis: Four simple methodologic fixes.
临床试验面临危机:四种简单的方法学改进措施。
Clin Trials. 2014 Dec;11(6):615-21. doi: 10.1177/1740774514553681. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
4
Enrollment of racially/ethnically diverse participants in traumatic brain injury trials: effect of availability of exception from informed consent.创伤性脑损伤试验中不同种族/民族参与者的入组:知情同意豁免的可及性的影响。
Clin Trials. 2014 Apr;11(2):187-94. doi: 10.1177/1740774514522560.
5
Does prolonged storage of red blood cells cause harm?储存时间过长的红细胞是否会造成危害?
Br J Haematol. 2014 Apr;165(1):3-16. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12747. Epub 2014 Jan 25.