Nomura Kohei, Akai Seiki
Osaka University, Japan.
Psychol Rep. 2012 Feb;110(1):304-14. doi: 10.2466/02.07.09.11.PR0.110.1.304-314.
The present research compared empathy for real people with empathy for fictional characters. 95 university students (53 men, 42 women) ages 18-22 years (M = 19.5, SD = 1.9) completed the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) and the Fictional IRI. The IRI is a widely used measure of human empathy, and the Fictional IRI contains items from the original IRI that have been modified to investigate empathy for fictional characters. Empathy for characters in fictional stories was found to correlate statistically significantly with empathy for real people on all but a few factors. The results of the present study indicate that empathy for real people and empathy for fictional characters are similar, suggesting that the Fantasy subscale of the IRI, which is limited to fictional stories, should be reconsidered.
本研究比较了对真实人物的同理心与对虚构角色的同理心。95名年龄在18 - 22岁(M = 19.5,SD = 1.9)的大学生(53名男性,42名女性)完成了人际反应指数(IRI)和虚构人际反应指数(Fictional IRI)。IRI是一种广泛使用的衡量人类同理心的指标,而虚构人际反应指数包含了原始IRI中的项目,这些项目经过修改以调查对虚构角色的同理心。除了少数几个因素外,发现对虚构故事中角色的同理心与对真实人物的同理心在统计学上有显著相关性。本研究结果表明,对真实人物的同理心和对虚构角色的同理心相似,这表明IRI中仅限于虚构故事的幻想子量表应重新考虑。