Sagili Suresh, Selva Dinesh, Malhotra Raman
Corneoplastic Unit, Queen Victoria Hospital, East Grinstead, West Sussex, United Kingdom.
Orbit. 2012 Apr;31(2):77-85. doi: 10.3109/01676830.2011.648797.
Lacrimal scintigraphy (LS) or dacryoscintigraphy can demonstrate abnormalities in 80%-95% of patients with symptoms of epiphora and a patent lacrimal system on syringing and up to 40% asymptomatic individuals. Precise localization of the site of delay may not always be possible due to lack of anatomic detail on LS. LS is considered useful in patients with epiphora with delayed tear clearance and patency to syringing and suspected to have either nasolacrimal duct (NLD) stenosis or lacrimal pump failure. It remains unclear, however, as to whether LS can reliably distinguish between the two. The literature reports considerable variation in the technique, normative data, analysis, and interpretation of LS. Qualitative or visual analysis is simpler to perform and to our knowledge used more frequently in comparison to quantitative analysis. There is little extra information to be gained from LS in cases with complete NLD obstruction or severe NLD stenosis on syringing.
泪腺闪烁造影(LS)或泪道闪烁造影可在80% - 95%有溢泪症状且泪道冲洗通畅的患者以及高达40%无症状个体中显示异常。由于LS缺乏解剖细节,可能无法始终精确确定延迟部位。对于有溢泪、泪液清除延迟且泪道冲洗通畅、怀疑有鼻泪管(NLD)狭窄或泪泵功能衰竭的患者,LS被认为是有用的。然而,尚不清楚LS是否能可靠地区分这两种情况。文献报道LS在技术、正常数据、分析和解读方面存在很大差异。定性或视觉分析操作更简单,据我们所知,与定量分析相比使用更频繁。在泪道冲洗显示鼻泪管完全阻塞或严重狭窄的病例中,从LS中几乎无法获得额外信息。