Chauvergne J, Rohart J, Héron J F, Aymé Y, Berlié J, Fargeot P, George M, Lebrun-Jezekova D, Pigneux J, Chenal C
Fédération nationale des centres de lutte contre le cancer (FNCLCC), Fondation Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
Bull Cancer. 1990;77(10):1007-24.
From 1982 to 1987, a randomized phase III trial was performed in order to determine the long-term effect of induction chemotherapy before standard pelvic irradiation in stage IIb-N1, III squamous cell carcinomas of the cervix. Patients were randomized to either chemotherapy and radiotherapy (C + R group) vs radiotherapy alone (R group). Radiotherapy for all patients consisted of 50 Gy in the pelvis with a boost by external irradiation or by brachytherapy (cumulative dose of 68 Gy). The chemotherapy regimen was an association of methotrexate (10 mg/m2, D2-4), chlorambucil (4 mg/m2, D1-5), vincristine (0,7 mg/m2, D1), cisplatin (80 mg/m2, D5), given every 3 wks; at least 2 courses were to be given before assessing efficacy and 2 more courses were given to patients who responded. One hundred and fifty-one patients were fully evaluable, after a mean follow-up of 38 mths (range 2-7 years), 76 in the R arm and 75 in the C + R arm. The response rate (greater than 50%) to chemotherapy was 42.5%. After completion of treatment, the complete response rate was 86.8% in the R arm and 86.3% in the C + R arm. The 3 year disease-free survival was 58.7% in the C + R group and 54.5% in the R group, and the median survival was 39.5% and 47 months respectively (NS). The survival of patients with a complete response at the end of radiotherapy was significantly better in the C + R group (when chemotherapy had been active) than in the R group (p = 0.04). Although radiotherapy was not modified whether patients had initial chemotherapy or not, tolerance was not significantly different between the 2 groups. The data collected in this study indicate that: 1) efficacy of induction chemotherapy is the only available predictive test for long-term results, 2) tolerance to treatment is crucial for optimal chemotherapy delivery, 3) higher dose intensity of chemotherapy in cervical carcinoma is associated with a better tumor reduction, and probably a better survival.
1982年至1987年,开展了一项随机III期试验,以确定IIb-N1期、III期宫颈鳞状细胞癌在标准盆腔放疗前进行诱导化疗的长期效果。患者被随机分为化疗联合放疗组(C + R组)和单纯放疗组(R组)。所有患者的放疗方案为盆腔照射50 Gy,通过外照射或近距离放疗进行增敏(累积剂量68 Gy)。化疗方案为甲氨蝶呤(10 mg/m²,第2 - 4天)、苯丁酸氮芥(4 mg/m²,第1 - 5天)、长春新碱(0.7 mg/m²,第1天)、顺铂(80 mg/m²,第5天)联合应用,每3周给药一次;在评估疗效前至少给予2个疗程,对有反应的患者再给予2个疗程。151例患者可进行全面评估,平均随访38个月(范围2 - 7年),R组76例,C + R组75例。化疗的缓解率(大于50%)为42.5%。治疗结束后,R组的完全缓解率为86.8%,C + R组为86.3%。C + R组的3年无病生存率为58.7%,R组为54.5%,中位生存期分别为39.5个月和47个月(无显著性差异)。放疗结束时完全缓解的患者,C + R组(化疗有效时)的生存率显著高于R组(p = 0.04)。尽管无论患者是否接受初始化疗,放疗方案均未改变,但两组的耐受性无显著差异。本研究收集的数据表明:1)诱导化疗的疗效是唯一可用于预测长期结果的检测方法;2)治疗耐受性对于优化化疗给药至关重要;3)宫颈癌化疗的更高剂量强度与更好的肿瘤缩小相关,可能生存率也更高。