Suppr超能文献

测量慢性病护理提供情况:患者体验和临床绩效。

Measuring chronic care delivery: patient experiences and clinical performance.

机构信息

Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Jun;24(3):206-13. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs018. Epub 2012 Apr 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relationship between clinical care metrics and patient experiences of care among patients with chronic disease.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey and clinical performance data.

SETTING

Eighty-nine medical groups across California caring for patients with chronic disease.

PARTICIPANTS

Using patient surveys, we identified 51 129 patients with a chronic disease.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Using patient surveys, we produced five composite measures of patient experiences of care and self-management support (scale 0-100). Using Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set data, we analyzed care for asthma, diabetes and cardiovascular disease, producing one composite summarizing clinical processes of care and one composite summarizing outcomes of care. We calculated adjusted Spearman's correlation coefficients to assess the relationship between patient experiences of care, clinical processes and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Clinical performance was higher for process measures compared with outcomes measures, ranging from 91% for appropriate asthma medication use to 59% for controlling low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the presence of diabetes. Performance on patient experiences of care measures was the highest for the quality of clinical interactions (88.5) and the lowest for delivery of self-management support (68.8). Three of the 10 patient experience-clinical performance composite correlations were statistically significant. These three correlations involved composites summarizing integration of care and quality of clinical interactions, and ranged from a low of 0.30 to a high of 0.39.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic care delivery is variable across diseases and domains of care. Improving care integration processes and communication between health-care providers and their patients may lead to improved clinical outcomes.

摘要

目的

评估慢性病患者的临床护理指标与患者护理体验之间的关系。

设计

横断面调查和临床绩效数据。

地点

加利福尼亚州的 89 个医疗集团,为慢性病患者提供服务。

参与者

通过患者调查,我们确定了 51129 名患有慢性病的患者。

主要观察指标

使用患者调查,我们生成了五项患者护理体验和自我管理支持的综合衡量指标(评分 0-100)。使用健康计划雇主数据和信息集数据,我们分析了哮喘、糖尿病和心血管疾病的护理情况,生成了一个综合衡量临床护理过程的指标和一个综合衡量护理结果的指标。我们计算了调整后的斯皮尔曼等级相关系数,以评估患者护理体验、临床过程和临床结果之间的关系。

结果

与结果衡量标准相比,临床绩效在过程衡量标准中更高,范围从适当使用哮喘药物的 91%到糖尿病患者控制低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的 59%。患者护理体验衡量标准的表现最高,临床互动的质量(88.5),自我管理支持的提供(68.8)最低。10 项患者体验-临床绩效综合衡量标准中的 3 项具有统计学意义。这三个关联涉及整合护理和临床互动质量的综合衡量标准,范围从低的 0.30 到高的 0.39。

结论

慢性病护理在疾病和护理领域之间存在差异。改善护理整合过程和医疗保健提供者与患者之间的沟通,可能会改善临床结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验