• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用电子健康记录衡量临床绩效的新范式。

New paradigms for measuring clinical performance using electronic health records.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Jun;24(3):200-5. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs011. Epub 2012 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzs011
PMID:22490301
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Measures of provider success are the centerpiece of quality improvement and pay-for-performance programs around the globe. In most nations, these measures are derived from administrative records, paper charts and consumer surveys; increasingly, electronic patient record systems are also being used. We use the term 'e-QMs' to describe quality measures that are based on data found within electronic health records and other related health information technology (HIT). We offer a framework or typology for e-QMs and describe opportunities and impediments associated with the transition from old to new

DATA SOURCES

If public and private systems of care are to effectively use HIT to support and evaluate health-care system quality and safety, the quality measurement field must embrace new paradigms and strategically address a series of technical, conceptual and practical challenges.

摘要

未加标签

在全球范围内,衡量供应商绩效的标准是质量改进和按绩效付费计划的核心。在大多数国家,这些衡量标准都来自于行政记录、纸质图表和消费者调查;越来越多的电子患者记录系统也在被使用。我们使用“电子质量指标”一词来描述基于电子健康记录和其他相关健康信息技术(HIT)中数据的质量指标。我们为电子质量指标提供了一个框架或分类法,并描述了从旧到新的过渡所带来的机遇和障碍。

资料来源

如果公共和私人医疗系统要有效地利用 HIT 来支持和评估医疗保健系统的质量和安全,那么质量测量领域必须接受新的范例,并从技术、概念和实际方面战略性地解决一系列挑战。

相似文献

1
New paradigms for measuring clinical performance using electronic health records.利用电子健康记录衡量临床绩效的新范式。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Jun;24(3):200-5. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs011. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
2
Measuring and improving patient safety through health information technology: The Health IT Safety Framework.通过健康信息技术衡量和改善患者安全:健康信息技术安全框架。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Apr;25(4):226-32. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004486. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
3
HIT potential to transform quality improvement.高影响力科技(HIT)变革质量改进的潜力。
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2011 Sep-Oct;36(5):328. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0b013e31822683b8.
4
Quality of documentation of electronic medical information systems at primary health care units in Alexandria, Egypt.埃及亚历山大市基层医疗单位电子医疗信息系统的文档质量
East Mediterr Health J. 2014 Mar 13;20(2):105-11.
5
Quality and safety of detailed clinical models.详细临床模型的质量与安全性。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;193:261-8.
6
Quality of Big Data in health care.医疗保健领域大数据的质量。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2015;28(6):621-34. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-07-2014-0080.
7
Transitions, realignments, and focus shifts: possibilities for biopsychosocial care in the electronic health record era.转变、重新调整与重点转移:电子健康记录时代生物心理社会护理的可能性
Int J Psychiatry Med. 2014;47(4):299-308. doi: 10.2190/PM.47.4.d.
8
Health information technology: transforming chronic disease management and care transitions.健康信息技术:变革慢性病管理与护理过渡
Prim Care. 2012 Jun;39(2):327-44. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
9
Measuring up: Implementing a dental quality measure in the electronic health record context.衡量标准:在电子健康记录环境中实施一项牙科质量指标。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2016 Jan;147(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2015.06.023. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
10
Health information technology and the electronic medical record.健康信息技术和电子病历。
Clin Nucl Med. 2010 Oct;35(10):788-9. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e3181ef3667.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of Physician Electronic Health Record Usage Analytics using Clinical Test Cases.使用临床测试案例分析医生电子健康记录使用的准确性。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Oct;13(5):928-934. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1756424. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
2
Association of Hospital Interoperable Data Sharing With Alternative Payment Model Participation.医院互操作数据共享与替代性支付模式参与的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Feb 18;3(2):e215199. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.5199. eCollection 2022 Feb.
3
Comparison of electronic versus manual abstraction for 2 standardized perinatal care measures.
电子与手动摘要对 2 项标准化围产保健措施的比较。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Apr 13;29(5):789-797. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab276.
4
Computable Phenotype Implementation for a National, Multicenter Pragmatic Clinical Trial: Lessons Learned From ADAPTABLE.可计算表型在全国多中心实用临床试验中的实施:ADAPTABLE 研究的经验教训
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Jun;13(6):e006292. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006292. Epub 2020 May 29.
5
Challenges to electronic clinical quality measurement using third-party platforms in primary care practices: the healthy hearts in the heartland experience.基层医疗实践中使用第三方平台进行电子临床质量测量面临的挑战:美国中西部地区“健康心脏”项目的经验
JAMIA Open. 2019 Sep 20;2(4):423-428. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz038. eCollection 2019 Dec.
6
Quality Informatics: The Convergence of Healthcare Data, Analytics, and Clinical Excellence.质量信息学:医疗保健数据、分析与卓越临床的融合。
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Mar;10(2):272-277. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1685221. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
7
Association of the Usability of Electronic Health Records With Cognitive Workload and Performance Levels Among Physicians.电子病历的可用性与医生认知工作量和绩效水平的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e191709. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1709.
8
Improvement of the quality payment program by improving data reporting process: an action research.通过改进数据报告流程提高质量支付计划:一项行动研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Sep 6;18(1):692. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3472-4.
9
Measuring Preventive Care Delivery: Comparing Rates Across Three Data Sources.衡量预防保健服务的提供:比较三个数据源的比率。
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Nov;51(5):752-761. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
10
A comparison of a multistate inpatient EHR database to the HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample.一个多州住院患者电子健康记录数据库与医疗成本和利用项目全国住院患者样本的比较。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 15;15:384. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1025-7.