• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗实践中使用第三方平台进行电子临床质量测量面临的挑战:美国中西部地区“健康心脏”项目的经验

Challenges to electronic clinical quality measurement using third-party platforms in primary care practices: the healthy hearts in the heartland experience.

作者信息

Ahmad Faraz S, Rasmussen Luke V, Persell Stephen D, Richardson Joshua E, Liss David T, Kenly Pauline, Chung Isabel, French Dustin D, Walunas Theresa L, Schriever Andy, Kho Abel N

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

The Center for Health Information Partnerships (CHiP), Institute of Public Health & Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

JAMIA Open. 2019 Sep 20;2(4):423-428. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz038. eCollection 2019 Dec.

DOI:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz038
PMID:32025638
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6994020/
Abstract

Third-party platforms have emerged to support small primary care practices for calculating and reporting electronic clinical quality measures (eCQM) for federal programs like The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) and Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS). Yet little is known about the capabilities and limitations of electronic health record systems (EHRs) to enable data access for these programs. We connected 116 small- to medium-sized practices with seven different EHRs to popHealth, an open-source eCQM platform. We identified the prevalence of following problems with eCQM data for data extraction in seven different EHRs: (1) Lack of coded data in five of seven; (2) Incorrectly categorized data in four of seven; (3) Isosemantic data (data within the incorrect context) in four of seven; (4) Coding that could not be directly evaluated in six of seven; (5) Errors in date assignment and labeled as historical values in five of seven; and (6) Inadequate data to assign the correct code in two of seven. We recommend specific enhancements to EHR systems that can promote effective eCQM implementation and reporting to MACRA and MIPS.

摘要

第三方平台已出现,以支持小型基层医疗实践机构计算和报告电子临床质量指标(eCQM),用于诸如2015年《医疗保险准入与儿童健康保险计划再授权法案》(MACRA)和基于绩效的激励支付系统(MIPS)等联邦项目。然而,对于电子健康记录系统(EHR)为这些项目提供数据访问的能力和局限性,人们知之甚少。我们将116家中小型医疗机构与七个不同的电子健康记录系统连接到popHealth,这是一个开源的eCQM平台。我们确定了七个不同电子健康记录系统中在提取eCQM数据时出现以下问题的普遍程度:(1)七个中有五个缺乏编码数据;(2)七个中有四个数据分类错误;(3)七个中有四个等语义数据(处于错误背景下的数据);(4)七个中有六个编码无法直接评估;(5)七个中有五个日期分配错误并被标记为历史值;以及(6)七个中有两个数据不足以分配正确的代码。我们建议对电子健康记录系统进行具体改进,以促进有效地实施eCQM并向MACRA和MIPS报告。

相似文献

1
Challenges to electronic clinical quality measurement using third-party platforms in primary care practices: the healthy hearts in the heartland experience.基层医疗实践中使用第三方平台进行电子临床质量测量面临的挑战:美国中西部地区“健康心脏”项目的经验
JAMIA Open. 2019 Sep 20;2(4):423-428. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz038. eCollection 2019 Dec.
2
Merit-Based Incentive Payment System: Meaningful Changes in the Final Rule Brings Cautious Optimism.基于绩效的激励支付系统:最终规则的重大变化带来谨慎乐观情绪。
Pain Physician. 2017 Jan-Feb;20(1):E1-E12.
3
The present and future of quality measures and public reporting in neurosurgery.神经外科质量指标与公开报告的现状及未来
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Dec;39(6):E3. doi: 10.3171/2015.8.FOCUS15354.
4
Future considerations for clinical dermatology in the setting of 21st century American policy reform: The Medicare Access and Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act and the Merit-based Incentive Payment System.21 世纪美国政策改革背景下临床皮肤科的未来思考:《平价医疗法案》和《儿童健康保险计划再授权法案》以及基于绩效的激励支付制度。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Jun;76(6):1206-1212. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.01.032. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
5
Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): Harsh Choices For Interventional Pain Management Physicians.基于绩效的激励支付系统(MIPS):介入性疼痛管理医生面临的艰难抉择
Pain Physician. 2016 Sep-Oct;19(7):E917-34.
6
Primary Care Practices' Ability to Report Electronic Clinical Quality Measures in the EvidenceNOW Southwest Initiative to Improve Heart Health.初级保健实践在 EvidenceNOW 西南倡议中报告电子临床质量指标以改善心脏健康的能力。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e198569. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8569.
7
Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) for Interventional Pain Management Practices: Challenges and Opportunities.介入性疼痛管理实践的医师质量报告系统(PQRS):挑战与机遇
Pain Physician. 2016 Jan;19(1):E15-32.
8
Chasm Between Cancer Quality Measures and Electronic Health Record Data Quality.癌症质量指标与电子健康记录数据质量之间的差距。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2022 Jan;6:e2100128. doi: 10.1200/CCI.21.00128.
9
Medicare Program; Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Model (APM) Incentive Under the Physician Fee Schedule, and Criteria for Physician-Focused Payment Models. Final rule with comment period.医疗保险计划;医师费率表下的基于绩效的激励支付系统(MIPS)和替代支付模式(APM)激励措施,以及以医师为重点的支付模式标准。有意见征求期的最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2016 Nov 4;81(214):77008-831.
10
Generating and Reporting Electronic Clinical Quality Measures from Electronic Health Records: Strategies from EvidenceNOW Cooperatives.从电子健康记录中生成和报告电子临床质量指标:来自“证据现在”合作组织的策略
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Mar;13(2):485-494. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1748145. Epub 2022 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Rationale and design for Healthy Hearts in Manufacturing (HHM): A pragmatic single-arm hybrid effectiveness-implementation study for hypertension management and tobacco cessation.制造业健康心脏(HHM)的原理与设计:一项针对高血压管理和戒烟的实用单臂混合有效性-实施性研究。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2025 Feb 3;44:101444. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101444. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Large Language Models for More Efficient Reporting of Hospital Quality Measures.用于更高效报告医院质量指标的大语言模型
NEJM AI. 2024 Oct 24;1(11). doi: 10.1056/aics2400420. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
3
A Cohort Analysis of Statin Treatment Patterns Among Small-Sized Primary Care Practices.小尺寸基层医疗实践中他汀类药物治疗模式的队列分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jun;37(8):1845-1852. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07191-9. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
4
Chasm Between Cancer Quality Measures and Electronic Health Record Data Quality.癌症质量指标与电子健康记录数据质量之间的差距。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2022 Jan;6:e2100128. doi: 10.1200/CCI.21.00128.
5
Clinical data sharing improves quality measurement and patient safety.临床数据共享可提高质量测量和患者安全性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jul 14;28(7):1534-1542. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab039.
6
Push Button Population Health: The SMART/HL7 FHIR Bulk Data Access Application Programming Interface.按钮式人群健康:SMART/HL7 FHIR批量数据访问应用程序编程接口
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Nov 19;3(1):151. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00358-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Design of healthy hearts in the heartland (H3): A practice-randomized, comparative effectiveness study.健康之心在中心地带的设计(H3):一项实践随机、比较效果研究。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Aug;71:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 2.
2
Primary Care Practices' Abilities And Challenges In Using Electronic Health Record Data For Quality Improvement.初级保健实践在利用电子健康记录数据进行质量改进方面的能力和挑战。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Apr;37(4):635-643. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1254.
3
Electronic clinical quality measure reporting challenges: findings from the Medicare EHR Incentive Program's Controlling High Blood Pressure Measure.电子临床质量衡量报告挑战:来自医疗保险电子健康记录激励计划控制高血压衡量标准的发现。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Feb 1;25(2):127-134. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx049.
4
The Challenges of Measuring, Improving, and Reporting Quality in Primary Care.基层医疗中衡量、改善及报告质量所面临的挑战。
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Mar;15(2):175-182. doi: 10.1370/afm.2014.
5
Why aren't they happy? An analysis of end-user satisfaction with Electronic health records.他们为什么不开心?对电子健康记录终端用户满意度的分析。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017 Feb 10;2016:2026-2035. eCollection 2016.
6
A national evaluation of a dissemination and implementation initiative to enhance primary care practice capacity and improve cardiovascular disease care: the ESCALATES study protocol.一项关于加强初级保健实践能力和改善心血管疾病护理的传播与实施倡议的全国性评估:ESCALATES研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2016 Jun 29;11(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0449-8.
7
National estimates of the impact of electronic health records on the workload of primary care physicians.电子健康记录对基层医疗医生工作量影响的全国性评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 May 10;16:172. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1422-6.
8
Effects of health information technology on patient outcomes: a systematic review.健康信息技术对患者结局的影响:一项系统综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Sep;23(5):1016-36. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv138. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
9
Consolidating CCDs from multiple data sources: a modular approach.整合来自多个数据源的临床护理数据:一种模块化方法。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Mar;23(2):317-23. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv084. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
10
Availability of structured and unstructured clinical data for comparative effectiveness research and quality improvement: a multisite assessment.用于比较效果研究和质量改进的结构化与非结构化临床数据的可获取性:一项多中心评估
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Jul 11;2(1):1079. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1079. eCollection 2014.