• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良的卵巢肿物恶性风险指数在卵巢肿物诊断中的应用。

An improved risk of malignancy index in diagnosis of adnexal mass.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong 266003, China.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Feb;125(3):533-5.

PMID:22490416
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the advent of color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) and technological development of detection of serum tumor markers, new opportunities are presented to the improved risk of malignancy index (RMI) based on Jacobs' research for predicting ovarian malignancy in patients with adnexal masses.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty women with an adnexal mass admitted for primary laparotomy were studied. Tumor specific growth factor (TSGF) adjusted ultrasound scores and the results of Doppler blood flow analysis were obtained before the operation. Based on the parameters which had been studied in Jacobs' research, TSGF levels and the findings of color Doppler flow imaging, the risk of malignancy model was redesigned using a binary Logistic regression model. The diagnostic efficacy of the improved risk of malignancy index (improved RMI) was compared with the Jacobs' model RMI by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

The ROC curve showed a higher sensitivity (Mcnamer's test, P < 0.05) in the discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses for the improved RMI than the RMI. Compared with the RMI, the improved RMI had an advantage in prediction of ovarian germ cell tumors and granular cell tumor (28.57% vs.71.43%, P < 0.05) and the early stage tumors and borderline tumors (33.33% vs. 66.67%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The predictability of the improved RMI is better than the classic Jacobs' model, especially in diagnosis of the ovarian germ cell tumors and granular cell tumor and other early stage adnexal tumors.

摘要

背景

随着彩色多谱勒血流成像(CDFI)的出现和检测血清肿瘤标志物技术的发展,为基于 Jacobs 研究的改良恶性肿瘤风险指数(RMI)预测附件肿块患者的卵巢恶性肿瘤提供了新的机会。

方法

对 180 名因附件肿块行初次剖腹术的女性进行研究。在手术前获得肿瘤特异性生长因子(TSGF)调整的超声评分和多普勒血流分析结果。根据 Jacobs 研究中研究的参数、TSGF 水平和彩色多谱勒血流成像的结果,使用二元 Logistic 回归模型重新设计了恶性风险模型。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线比较改良恶性风险指数(改良 RMI)与 Jacobs 模型 RMI 的诊断效能。

结果

ROC 曲线显示,改良 RMI 对鉴别附件良恶性肿块的敏感性更高(Mcnamer 检验,P<0.05)。与 RMI 相比,改良 RMI 预测卵巢生殖细胞肿瘤和颗粒细胞瘤(28.57%比 71.43%,P<0.05)和早期肿瘤和交界性肿瘤(33.33%比 66.67%,P<0.05)有优势。

结论

改良 RMI 的预测能力优于经典 Jacobs 模型,特别是在诊断卵巢生殖细胞肿瘤和颗粒细胞瘤以及其他早期附件肿瘤方面。

相似文献

1
An improved risk of malignancy index in diagnosis of adnexal mass.改良的卵巢肿物恶性风险指数在卵巢肿物诊断中的应用。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Feb;125(3):533-5.
2
Inclusion of CA-125 does not improve mathematical models developed to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal tumors.纳入CA - 125并不能改善为区分良性和恶性附件肿瘤而建立的数学模型。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Sep 20;25(27):4194-200. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.5943. Epub 2007 Aug 13.
3
External validation of diagnostic models to estimate the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses.附件肿块恶性肿瘤风险评估的诊断模型的外部验证。
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Feb 1;18(3):815-25. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0879. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
4
The risk of malignancy index in discrimination of adnexal masses.鉴别附件包块时的恶性肿瘤风险指数
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Mar;96(3):186-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.10.006. Epub 2007 Feb 5.
5
[The estimation of the probability of tumor malignacy on the basis of test combination in the primary diagnosis of adnexal tumors].[基于联合检测在附件肿瘤初步诊断中评估肿瘤恶性概率]
Ginekol Pol. 2010 Apr;81(4):254-61.
6
Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.附件肿块使用灰阶和多普勒超声检查结果的主观评估难以明确良恶性:逻辑回归模型无助于诊断。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;38(4):456-65. doi: 10.1002/uog.9030. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
7
Role of a risk of malignancy index in clinical approaches to adnexal masses.恶性肿瘤风险指数在附件包块临床处理中的作用
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(18):7793-7. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.18.7793.
8
Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.病灶大小影响 IOTA 逻辑回归模型、IOTA 简单规则和恶性风险指数在鉴别附件包块良恶性方面的诊断性能。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Sep;40(3):345-54. doi: 10.1002/uog.11167. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
9
Preoperative evaluation and triage of women with suspicious adnexal masses using risk of malignancy index.使用恶性风险指数对附件包块可疑的女性进行术前评估和分诊。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009 Feb;35(1):131-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00869.x.
10
Artificial neural network models for the preoperative discrimination between malignant and benign adnexal masses.用于术前鉴别附件肿块良恶性的人工神经网络模型
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jan;13(1):17-25. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.13010017.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Can Replacing CA125 with HE4 in Risk of Malignancy Indices 1-4 Improve Diagnostic Performance in the Presurgical Assessment of Adnexal Tumors?在术前评估附件肿瘤时,用 HE4 替代 CA125 对风险恶性指数 1-4 是否能改善诊断性能?
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:6712376. doi: 10.1155/2017/6712376. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
2
Diagnostic value of ultrasound indicators of neoplastic risk in preoperative differentiation of adnexal masses.附件肿块术前鉴别中肿瘤风险超声指标的诊断价值
J Ultrason. 2013 Jun;13(53):145-54. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2013.0015. Epub 2013 Jun 30.