Suppr超能文献

鉴别附件包块时的恶性肿瘤风险指数

The risk of malignancy index in discrimination of adnexal masses.

作者信息

Ulusoy S, Akbayir O, Numanoglu C, Ulusoy N, Odabas E, Gulkilik A

机构信息

Gynecological Oncology Clinic, Istanbul Bakirkoy Women and Children Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Mar;96(3):186-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.10.006. Epub 2007 Feb 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the ability of the risk of malignancy index (RMI) based on a serum CA125 level, ultrasound findings and menopausal status, to discriminate benign from malignant adnexal masses.

METHOD

Between September 2002 and November 2004, 296 women with adnexal masses were enrolled. The sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of the CA125 serum level, ultrasound findings and menopausal status in prediction of ovarian cancer were calculated and compared individually or combined into the RMI.

RESULTS

The RMI identified malignant cases more accurately than any individual criterion in diagnosing ovarian cancer. Using a cut-off level of 153 to indicate malignancy, the RMI showed a sensitivity of 76.4%, a specificity of 77.9%, a PPV of 65.9%, a NPV of 85.5% with 79.4% correct diagnosis rate.

CONCLUSION

The RMI is an appropriate method in diagnosing adnexal masses with high risk of malignancy and forwarding to gynecological oncology centers for suitable surgical operations.

摘要

目的

评估基于血清CA125水平、超声检查结果及绝经状态的恶性风险指数(RMI)区分附件包块良恶性的能力。

方法

2002年9月至2004年11月,纳入296例有附件包块的女性。计算并比较CA125血清水平、超声检查结果及绝经状态预测卵巢癌的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV),并单独或合并为RMI。

结果

在诊断卵巢癌时,RMI比任何单一标准都能更准确地识别恶性病例。以153为界值提示恶性,RMI的敏感性为76.4%,特异性为77.9%,PPV为65.9%,NPV为85.5%,正确诊断率为79.4%。

结论

RMI是诊断具有高恶性风险附件包块并将其转诊至妇科肿瘤中心进行合适手术的一种合适方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验