Yuan Jun-liang, Wang Shuang-kun, Peng Peng, Guo Xiao-juan, Gu Hua, Li Shu-juan, Qin Wei, Hu Wen-li
Department of Neurology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012 Jan 17;92(3):147-51.
To explore the characteristics of cognitive impairment in patients with leukoaraiosis (LA).
Forty-six LA patients and 38 age and gender-matched healthy subjects were recruited from the Department of Neurology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University between September 2010 and March 2011. All participants underwent the neuropsychological tests recommended by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network Vascular Cognitive Impairment Harmonization Standards (NINDS/CSN). The were divided into 3 different groups (mild, moderate and severe) according to the Fazekas scale. The differences of neuropsychological performances were compared among 3 groups.
The LA patients were associated with comprehensive cognitive function deficits, including MMSE (24.4 ± 3.2 vs 28.3 ± 1.2), MoCA (20.4 ± 3.0 vs 26.2 ± 0.8), digital span forward (5.7 ± 0.9 vs 6.8 ± 1.0), digital span backward (3.5 ± 0.7 vs 4.1 ± 0.7), Stroop-B (69 ± 13 vs 43 ± 5), Stroop-C (141 ± 42 vs 65 ± 10), trail making test-A (73 ± 15 vs 31 ± 7), trail making test-B (126 ± 18 vs 82 ± 6) and digit symbol test (25 ± 6 vs 37 ± 5, P < 0.05). However, there was no difference in the performance of verbal fluency (12.7 ± 2.5 vs 13.4 ± 2.5, P > 0.05). Correlation analysis showed that the severity of LA had a negative correlation with the performance of MoCA (r = -0.601, P = 0.002).
The LA patients are closely correlated with cognitive impairments of attention, memory, executive function and information processing speed. It may be attributed to the frontal-subcortical circuitry dysfunction.
探讨脑白质疏松症(LA)患者认知障碍的特点。
2010年9月至2011年3月期间,从首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院神经内科招募了46例LA患者以及38例年龄和性别相匹配的健康受试者。所有参与者均接受了美国国立神经疾病与中风研究所-加拿大中风网络血管性认知障碍协调标准(NINDS/CSN)推荐的神经心理学测试。根据 Fazekas 量表将他们分为3个不同组(轻度、中度和重度)。比较3组之间神经心理学表现的差异。
LA患者存在综合认知功能缺陷,包括简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)(24.4±3.2对28.3±1.2)、蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)(20.4±3.0对26.2±0.8)、顺背数字广度(5.7±0.9对6.8±1.0)、倒背数字广度(3.5±0.7对4.1±0.7)、Stroop-B(69±13对43±5)、Stroop-C(141±42对65±10)、连线测验-A(73±15对31±7)、连线测验-B(126±18对82±6)和数字符号测验(25±6对37±5,P<0.05)。然而,言语流畅性表现无差异(12.7±2.5对13.4±2.5,P>0.05)。相关性分析表明,LA的严重程度与MoCA表现呈负相关(r = -0.601,P = 0.002)。
LA患者与注意力、记忆力、执行功能和信息处理速度的认知障碍密切相关。这可能归因于额叶-皮质下环路功能障碍。