Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Jun;78(12):4481-9. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07878-11. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) is a widely used technique in microbial community analysis, allowing the quantification of the number of target genes in a community sample. Currently, the standard-curve (SC) method of absolute quantification is widely employed for these kinds of analysis. However, the SC method assumes that the amplification efficiency (E) is the same for both the standard and the sample target template. We analyzed 19 bacterial strains and nine environmental samples in qPCR assays, targeting the nifH and 16S rRNA genes. The E values of the qPCRs differed significantly, depending on the template. This has major implications for the quantification. If the sample and standard differ in their E values, quantification errors of up to orders of magnitude are possible. To address this problem, we propose and test the one-point calibration (OPC) method for absolute quantification. The OPC method corrects for differences in E and was derived from the ΔΔC(T) method with correction for E, which is commonly used for relative quantification in gene expression studies. The SC and OPC methods were compared by quantifying artificial template mixtures from Geobacter sulfurreducens (DSM 12127) and Nostoc commune (Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa [CCAP] 1453/33), which differ in their E values. While the SC method deviated from the expected nifH gene copy number by 3- to 5-fold, the OPC method quantified the template mixtures with high accuracy. Moreover, analyzing environmental samples, we show that even small differences in E between the standard and the sample can cause significant differences between the copy numbers calculated by the SC and the OPC methods.
实时荧光定量 PCR(qPCR)是一种广泛应用于微生物群落分析的技术,可定量测定群落样本中目标基因的数量。目前,绝对定量的标准曲线(SC)方法被广泛应用于此类分析。然而,SC 方法假设标准和样品靶模板的扩增效率(E)相同。我们在 qPCR 检测中分析了 19 株细菌和 9 个环境样本,针对 nifH 和 16S rRNA 基因。qPCR 的 E 值因模板而异,差异显著。这对定量有重大影响。如果样品和标准的 E 值不同,则可能会出现数量级的定量误差。为了解决这个问题,我们提出并测试了用于绝对定量的单点校准(OPC)方法。OPC 方法校正了 E 的差异,源自通常用于基因表达研究中相对定量的 ΔΔC(T) 方法与 E 校正。我们通过定量 Geobacter sulfurreducens(DSM 12127)和 Nostoc commune(藻类和原生动物培养物收集中心[CCAP]1453/33)的人工模板混合物来比较 SC 和 OPC 方法,这两种混合物的 E 值不同。虽然 SC 方法偏离预期的 nifH 基因拷贝数 3-5 倍,但 OPC 方法可以高精度地定量模板混合物。此外,分析环境样本时,我们表明即使标准和样品之间的 E 值存在微小差异,也会导致 SC 和 OPC 方法计算的拷贝数之间存在显著差异。