• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Readability of hospice materials to prepare families for caregiving at the time of death.临终关怀材料的可读性,以便在死亡时为家属做好护理准备。
Res Nurs Health. 2012 Jun;35(3):242-9. doi: 10.1002/nur.21477. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
2
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
3
The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.心脏杂音在线教育资料的质量、易懂性、可理解性和普及性。
Cardiol Young. 2020 Mar;30(3):328-336. doi: 10.1017/S104795111900307X. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
4
Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Trigeminal Neuralgia.评估三叉神经痛在线患者教育材料的可读性。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Dec;144:e934-e938. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.09.123. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
5
Readability and Accessibility of Patient-Education Materials for Heart Failure in the United States.美国心力衰竭患者教育材料的可读性和可及性
J Card Fail. 2025 Jan;31(1):154-157. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.06.015. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
6
Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information.在线眼科患者信息的可读性评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec;131(12):1610-6. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5521.
7
The Readability of AAOS Patient Education Materials: Evaluating the Progress Since 2008.美国矫形外科医师学会患者教育材料的可读性:评估自2008年以来的进展
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Sep 7;98(17):e70. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00658.
8
Computerized versus hand-scored health literacy tools: a comparison of Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Flesch-Kincaid in printed patient education materials.计算机化与人工评分的健康素养工具:印刷版患者教育材料中简明语言可读性量表(SMOG)与弗莱什-金凯德阅读难度分级法的比较
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Jan;106(1):38-45. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.262. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
9
Readability of online patient education materials for shoulder instability surgery in English and Spanish.英文和西班牙文的肩部不稳定手术在线患者教育材料的可读性
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Oct;33(10):2220-2229. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.02.028. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
10
Readability of neurosurgery-related patient education materials provided by the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the National Library of Medicine and National Institutes of Health.神经外科相关患者教育材料的可读性:美国神经外科学会、美国国家医学图书馆、美国国立卫生研究院的提供情况
World Neurosurg. 2013 Nov;80(5):e33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.09.007. Epub 2011 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Closing the Gap in Hospice Utilization for the Minority Medicare Population.缩小少数族裔医疗保险人群临终关怀服务利用方面的差距。
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2019 Jun 27;5:2333721419855667. doi: 10.1177/2333721419855667. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
2
Promoting improved family caregiver health literacy: evaluation of caregiver communication resources.促进家庭护理人员健康素养的提高:护理人员沟通资源评估
Psychooncology. 2017 Jul;26(7):935-942. doi: 10.1002/pon.4117. Epub 2016 Mar 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Informal caregivers of cancer patients: perceptions about preparedness and support during hospice care.癌症患者的非正式照护者:对临终关怀期间准备情况及支持的看法。
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2011 Jan;54(1):92-115. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2010.534547.
2
Readability level of patient information leaflets for older people.老年人用药信息传单的可读性水平。
Ir J Med Sci. 2011 Mar;180(1):139-42. doi: 10.1007/s11845-010-0624-x. Epub 2010 Nov 3.
3
Health literacy and communication explored from different angles.从不同角度探讨健康素养与沟通。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Apr;79(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.02.019.
4
Health literacy and English language comprehension among elderly inpatients at an urban safety-net hospital.城市安全网医院老年住院患者的健康素养与英语语言理解能力
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2009 Summer;32(1):30-50.
5
Health literacy and cognitive performance in older adults.老年人的健康素养与认知表现
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Aug;57(8):1475-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02347.x. Epub 2009 Jun 8.
6
Social cognition under stress: differential effects of stress-induced cortisol elevations in healthy young men and women.应激下的社会认知:应激诱导的健康年轻男性和女性皮质醇升高的差异效应。
Horm Behav. 2009 Apr;55(4):507-13. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.01.011. Epub 2009 Feb 7.
7
Are end-of-life patient education materials readable?临终患者教育材料是否具有可读性?
Palliat Med. 2009 Sep;23(6):545-8. doi: 10.1177/0269216309106313. Epub 2009 May 21.
8
Readability and patient education materials used for low-income populations.面向低收入人群的可读性和患者教育材料。
Clin Nurse Spec. 2009 Jan-Feb;23(1):33-40; quiz 41-2. doi: 10.1097/01.NUR.0000343079.50214.31.
9
Materials to prepare hospice families for dying in the home.为临终关怀家庭在家中离世做准备的材料。
J Palliat Med. 2008 Sep;11(7):969-72. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2008.0072.
10
Printed health information materials: evaluation of readability and suitability.印刷版健康信息材料:可读性与适用性评估
J Community Health Nurs. 2008 Apr-Jun;25(2):73-90. doi: 10.1080/07370010802017083.

临终关怀材料的可读性,以便在死亡时为家属做好护理准备。

Readability of hospice materials to prepare families for caregiving at the time of death.

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

出版信息

Res Nurs Health. 2012 Jun;35(3):242-9. doi: 10.1002/nur.21477. Epub 2012 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1002/nur.21477
PMID:22492500
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4146484/
Abstract

Many health care materials are not written at levels that can be understood by most lay people. In this descriptive study, we examined the readability of documents used by hospices to prepare families for caregiving at the time of death. We used two common formulae to examine the documents. The mean Flesch-Kincaid grade level was 8.95 (SD 1.80). The mean Simple Measure of Gobbledygook grade level was 11.06 (SD 1.36). When we used the Colors Label Ease for Adult Readers instrument, it became evident that medical terminology was the primary reason for the high-grade levels. Most documents (78%) included medical terms that were directly (46.2%) or indirectly (25.6%) explained in the text. Modification of hospice materials could improve families' comprehension of information important for optimal end-of-life care.

摘要

许多医疗保健材料的写作水平并不能为大多数非专业人士所理解。在这项描述性研究中,我们检查了临终关怀机构在患者死亡时为家属准备护理时使用的文件的可读性。我们使用了两种常见的公式来检查这些文件。平均弗莱什-金凯德阅读水平为 8.95(标准差 1.80)。平均简单测谬阅读水平为 11.06(标准差 1.36)。当我们使用 Colors Label Ease for Adult Readers 工具时,很明显,医学术语是造成高等级水平的主要原因。大多数文件(78%)包含直接(46.2%)或间接(25.6%)在文本中解释的医学术语。修改临终关怀材料可以提高家属对最佳临终关怀信息的理解。