• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人用药信息传单的可读性水平。

Readability level of patient information leaflets for older people.

机构信息

Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2011 Mar;180(1):139-42. doi: 10.1007/s11845-010-0624-x. Epub 2010 Nov 3.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-010-0624-x
PMID:21046472
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited literacy is associated with a nearly twofold increase in mortality in older patients.

AIMS

The aim was to assess the readability level of patient information leaflets in Ireland.

METHODS

The SMOG formula is a validated tool to assess readability of text, providing an estimate of the years of education needed to understand a piece of writing. We evaluated 45 common patient information leaflets for older people, and compared them to newspapers.

RESULTS

The mean readability level of the patient education leaflets was 12.57 (range 9.4-16.33). The mean readability level of broadsheet newspapers was 12. A majority of patient education materials are written at an excessively high readability level.

CONCLUSION

Patient education information should be aimed at an appropriate level for the target audience. This is of particular relevance in the older population, who are at a higher risk of inadequate or marginal health literacy.

摘要

背景

有限的文化程度与老年患者的死亡率增加近两倍有关。

目的

评估爱尔兰患者信息传单的可读性水平。

方法

SMOG 公式是一种评估文本可读性的有效工具,可估算理解一篇文章所需的教育年限。我们评估了 45 种常见的老年人患者信息传单,并将其与报纸进行了比较。

结果

患者教育传单的平均可读性水平为 12.57(范围为 9.4-16.33)。大报的平均可读性水平为 12。大多数患者教育材料的可读性水平过高。

结论

患者教育信息应针对目标受众的适当水平。这在老年人群中尤为重要,因为他们处于健康素养不足或边缘的风险更高。

相似文献

1
Readability level of patient information leaflets for older people.老年人用药信息传单的可读性水平。
Ir J Med Sci. 2011 Mar;180(1):139-42. doi: 10.1007/s11845-010-0624-x. Epub 2010 Nov 3.
2
The readability and suitability of sexual health promotion leaflets.性健康促进宣传册的可读性与适用性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Feb;99(2):284-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
3
Evaluation of the Readability of Dermatological Postoperative Patient Information Leaflets Across England.英格兰皮肤科术后患者信息手册可读性评估
Dermatol Surg. 2016 Jun;42(6):757-63. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000720.
4
Readability of Patient Education Materials in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R): A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.物理医学与康复(PM&R)患者教育材料的可读性:一项比较性横断面研究。
PM R. 2020 Apr;12(4):368-373. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12230. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
5
Readability of patient education materials in ophthalmology: a single-institution study and systematic review.眼科患者教育材料的可读性:一项单机构研究及系统评价
BMC Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug 3;16:133. doi: 10.1186/s12886-016-0315-0.
6
Assessment of online patient education materials designed for people with age-related macular degeneration.针对年龄相关性黄斑变性患者设计的在线患者教育材料评估。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01664-x.
7
A descriptive study of the readability of patient information leaflets designed by nurses.一项关于护士所设计患者信息手册可读性的描述性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 1997 Nov;26(5):985-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.00455.x.
8
Readability levels of selected hypercholesterolemia patient education literature.所选高胆固醇血症患者教育文献的可读性水平。
Heart Lung. 1993 Sep-Oct;22(5):415-20.
9
Readability of subject information leaflets for medical research.医学研究受试者信息手册的可读性
N Z Med J. 1994 Dec 14;107(991):509-10.
10
Development of SMOG-Cro readability formula for healthcare communication and patient education.用于医疗保健沟通和患者教育的SMOG-Cro可读性公式的开发。
Coll Antropol. 2015 Mar;39(1):11-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Utility of medicines information leaflets in hypertensive care in a setting with low health literacy: A cross-sectional study.健康素养较低背景下药品信息手册在高血压护理中的效用:一项横断面研究。
Med Access Point Care. 2020 May 13;4:2399202620910031. doi: 10.1177/2399202620910031. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
2
Quality of Late-Life Depression Information on the Internet: Website Evaluation Study.互联网上老年抑郁症信息的质量:网站评估研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Sep 12;6(9):e36177. doi: 10.2196/36177.
3
Factors that Facilitate and Hinder the Comprehension of Patient Information Leaflets (PILs): A Brief Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Limited literacy and mortality in the elderly: the health, aging, and body composition study.老年人的有限读写能力与死亡率:健康、衰老和身体成分研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Aug;21(8):806-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00539.x.
2
Limited literacy in older people and disparities in health and healthcare access.老年人识字能力有限以及健康和医疗保健获取方面的差异。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 May;54(5):770-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00691.x.
3
Health literacy: report of the Council on Scientific Affairs. Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association.
促进和阻碍患者信息手册(PILs)理解的因素:一项简要的范围综述
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Nov 10;12:740334. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.740334. eCollection 2021.
4
Sexual health communication in COPD: The role, contents and design of patient information leaflets.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的性健康沟通:患者信息传单的作用、内容和设计。
Chron Respir Dis. 2021 Jan-Dec;18:14799731211020322. doi: 10.1177/14799731211020322.
5
Effects of a pain self-management intervention combining written and video elements on health-related quality of life among people with different levels of education.一种结合书面和视频元素的疼痛自我管理干预措施对不同教育水平人群健康相关生活质量的影响。
J Pain Res. 2015 Aug 20;8:581-90. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S85741. eCollection 2015.
6
Readability of hospice materials to prepare families for caregiving at the time of death.临终关怀材料的可读性,以便在死亡时为家属做好护理准备。
Res Nurs Health. 2012 Jun;35(3):242-9. doi: 10.1002/nur.21477. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
健康素养:科学事务委员会报告。美国医学协会科学事务委员会健康素养特设委员会
JAMA. 1999 Feb 10;281(6):552-7.
4
Health literacy among Medicare enrollees in a managed care organization.管理式医疗组织中医疗保险参保人的健康素养
JAMA. 1999 Feb 10;281(6):545-51. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.6.545.
5
Patient's understanding of health information: a multihospital comparison.患者对健康信息的理解:多医院比较
Patient Educ Couns. 1994 Aug;24(1):73-8. doi: 10.1016/0738-3991(94)90027-2.
6
Inadequate functional health literacy among patients at two public hospitals.两家公立医院患者的功能性健康素养不足。
JAMA. 1995 Dec 6;274(21):1677-82.